Cheapest route for internet?

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Cheapest route for internet?

  1. #1
    nuclear launch detected kpxgq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    16,612

    Cheapest route for internet?

    Im helping out my friend hookup internet at her sorority house for as cheap as possible.. see anything wrong?

    6 computers upstairs
    3 computers downstairs


    i was thinking a 4 port router downstairs hooked up to the cable modem and running a 50 foot cable upstairs and putting an 8port switch up there...

    is there a cheaper way to do this? keeping cat5 cable costs in consideration
    bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t

  2. #2
    Hammerhead Shark Tekime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Falmouth, ME
    Posts
    2,347
    That looks pretty good. Unless you swap the switch out for a cheaper hub I think that's minimal for equipment anyway. If you have an old rig you could use Linux as a router (set up NAT/IPTABLES on any distro or check out www.smoothwall.org or www.ipcop.org which look very good, I'm testing IPCop right now). You'd need a bigger switch though.
    Stuff and stuff

  3. #3
    NullPointerException rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    6,203
    Running cables is a pian in the butt and messy. I'd recommend a wireless router and wireless NICs. A little more investment upfront, but a whole lot nicer and expandable and no running cables from room to room.

    Open Source is free like a puppy is free.

    It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames.

    Understanding Evolution

  4. #4
    Mako Shark
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    4,402
    Originally posted by rock
    Running cables is a pian in the butt and messy. I'd recommend a wireless router and wireless NICs. A little more investment upfront, but a whole lot nicer and expandable and no running cables from room to room.
    Good but depends on bandwidth. If bandwidth is important, wired is the way to go.
    Desktop: Athlon XP 2500+/333 @12*180, 2x 512pc3200 DC, Epox 8rda (nforce2), X800 XL 256MB, WD 200 GB, Lite-On 4x +- DVDRW
    Laptop: Dell Inspiron, Centrino Duo 1.83ghz, 1GB Ram, 100 GB HD, 256 MB Radeon 1400, 17" widescreen display


    www.russsscope.net

  5. #5
    Hammerhead Shark Tekime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Falmouth, ME
    Posts
    2,347
    Wireless is a bit more than a 'little' investment too. Atleast compared to the wired alternative.
    Stuff and stuff

  6. #6
    Hammerhead Shark Racer^'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,758
    Well, you can go two routes with wireless: 54Mb/s or 11Mb/s.

    The 54Mb/s will run around $80-90 for a good WAP and $40 for a good NIC.
    If you want to go for the cheaper 11Mb/s route, you can get a entry-level WAP router for around $50 and a NIC for around $20.

    If you compare this to the cost of running a wired network (including cabling, crimping, etc) with the 2 HUBs and NICs, then you will probably break even if you compare it to the 11Mb/s system. However, the 54Mb/s will always be more expensive.
    Last edited by Racer^; 09-10-2003 at 01:39 PM.

  7. #7
    Hammerhead Shark Tekime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Falmouth, ME
    Posts
    2,347
    Wow, that is pretty cheap. I didn't realize they had gone down this much -- all the equipment I see locally is still priced very high. Still, 11Mbps is a bit slow, so it really depends on their bandwidth requirements.
    Stuff and stuff

  8. #8
    8 Wheels Move The Soul Ashpool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,174
    Originally posted by Tekime
    Wow, that is pretty cheap. I didn't realize they had gone down this much -- all the equipment I see locally is still priced very high. Still, 11Mbps is a bit slow, so it really depends on their bandwidth requirements.
    However, considering this is for sharing internet, 11Mbps is plenty. Many Residential internet connections don't even saturate 1/10th of that.

    This is a College Sorority, too. I seriously doubt they'd be moving massive files from one rig to another, and even then I don't think they'd really give a damn about the speed difference.
    Last edited by Ashpool; 09-10-2003 at 02:49 PM.
    #1) Big Box
    Core 2 Quad Q9550 - Asus P5Q3 - 8GB DDR3 1333 - GeForce 550Ti - Win 7 Pro
    #2) IBM Thinkpad R51
    Pentium M 1.6GHz - 1GB PC2700 - 80GB - Win 7 Pro

    #3) Macbook Pro
    2.4GHz Core i5 - 4GB - OS X Lion

    #4) Rollerskates
    Bont Quad Racer Carbon - Sure-Grip Avengers - Qube 8-Balls

    Now Playing: Forza 4, Wipeout HD, Dead Space 2 (again!)

  9. #9
    NullPointerException rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    6,203
    Even at 11 Mbps the bandwidth isn't going to be an issue at all. Even if they all start playing network games.

    And if you've never run cabling before, I cannot state strongly enough how annoying it is. One place I ran it had drop ceilings, so access to the walls and getting room to room wasn't technically hard - but jeeze, what a pain in the butt.

    Then I helped a friend wire his house. Very painful and very non-upgradable. Nice looking wall jacks in the end, but not worth the effort by any stretch. And know what he has to do when he needs another connection upstairs? Same thing all over again.

    Wireless is sooo much easier. Plus, they'll all end up with NICs that could probably be used in the school library, etc. sooner or later.

    Open Source is free like a puppy is free.

    It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames.

    Understanding Evolution

  10. #10

    Re: Cheapest route for internet?

    Originally posted by kpxgq
    Im helping out my friend hookup internet at her sorority house for as cheap as possible.. see anything wrong?

    6 computers upstairs
    3 computers downstairs


    i was thinking a 4 port router downstairs hooked up to the cable modem and running a 50 foot cable upstairs and putting an 8port switch up there...

    is there a cheaper way to do this? keeping cat5 cable costs in consideration
    Make sure to get those digits when you are hooking it all up
    Free Computer Magazine Subscriptions

    PC:
    AMD Barton 2500+ @2.2GHZ(200x11)
    FAN Zalman CNPS3100+
    MSI K7N2 Delta Series
    512MB Kingston HyperX DDR PC3500(@400)
    ATI Radeaon 9600 Pro (470/329)
    WD 120Gig @7200RPM
    48X CD-RW
    on board sound and Lan
    WINXP

  11. #11
    Reef Shark WaRmAsTeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    451
    Hi!

    You said you want to keep the costs down...

    I have 3 computers, but my setup is almost what you need...

    I've got a router in one room with the modem and one computer hooked up there.
    Then I have a 50ft cable running to a switch in another room, where 2 computer are hooked up.

    Here's how much this cost me :
    Router : 9.99$CDN after mail in rebate (no joke, works so well!)
    Switch : Old 10/100 switch I had, you can get one of those for 20$ on ebay I'm sure!
    Network cards : Dirt cheap!
    50ft of cable : 20$ max

    So all in all this solution is really cheap and get the job done at 100Mbps!

    Sure you have to run the cable, but I personnally like doing that!
    AMD Palomino 1700+, ECS K7S5A, ATI Radeon 8500 64MB, Seagate 7200rpm SCSI, 512mb PC2100 DDR, 2x BenQ FP783 17" LCD

  12. #12
    nuclear launch detected kpxgq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    16,612
    i was thinking about wireless but i dont know if the signal will go through all the walls.. + $30 for each wireless NIC x 9 computers = alot of $$$$$.. everyone already has a regular NIC
    bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t

  13. #13
    NullPointerException rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    York, PA
    Posts
    6,203
    Originally posted by kpxgq
    i was thinking about wireless but i dont know if the signal will go through all the walls.. + $30 for each wireless NIC x 9 computers = alot of $$$$$.. everyone already has a regular NIC
    Signal goes through most walls without a problem. In my house (just under 5000 sq. feet) there's only one place the signal strenght drops below 50% and I think it's going through two sets of duct work there.

    Open Source is free like a puppy is free.

    It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames.

    Understanding Evolution

  14. #14
    Hammerhead Shark mikeki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,245
    If you go wireless, then make sure there are NO 2.8Ghz remote phones in the house. Talk about completely screwing up the network. Your original wired plan sounds awesome to me.
    Laptop: Inspiron 8600 | Pentium M - 1.5GHz | 1.5GB RAM | 80GB 7200RPM | ATI Mobility 9600 Pro | Runs WoW OK
    Gaming: ASUS P5B Deluxe | E6600 | NSK6500 | 2GB RAM | EVGA 7900GTO | 2xWD 5000KS | NEC 3550A | Dell 2405 | Runs WoW Great!
    Garage1: IBM PC 5150 | 4.77MHz 8088 | 640KB RAM | 2x160KB Floppy | 10MB HD | 320x200x4 color | Runs Bards Tale Great!
    Garage2: Apple II+ | 1.0MHz 6502 | 48KB RAM | 2x140KB Floppies | 40x48x16 color | Runs Wizardry Great!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •