I'm in a bit of a moral bind here. I've never claimed an overclock that wasn't stable before. (Expect for when i first said my tbird 1.4 could do 1733, but i fixed that with a new PSU). But my duron 1g which i use as a work system, i've been running it @ 185 x 7.5 (1400) for a few days now without a hich looping 3Dmark ect.

One of our P4 systems failed this morning and i gave up my pc as a temp replacment. Now enough BS, the accounting software truned my previously "stable" overclock to something that ran more like a first gen KT133 chipset, which is alitte embarrising when it used to run without a giltch on a celeron 366.

The ponit of this is, when do you consider your overclock stable ?