|
-
MakoSharkero
Colossus
Why would you want the 2nd HD be on the second channel as a slave? instead of a master?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
reread my original post, i do believe i said something to the effect that they could be switched around, i just gave my preference, being doing it this way for years without problems. i prefer the burner in the master slot, a personal preference, and having the other HD as slave or master on the secondary IDE shouldn't make a spit of difference for speed of access.
just wondering if you some insight on the Master/Slave thing.
baldy
I am gettin too old for all this st.ff!
Specs? it runs.................
Tbird quotes:
"I dont care that much for gaming"
"I am done with 3dmark."
AsRock 970 Extreme4,Vishera 8320 @4.6, Vertex 4 256GB SataIII SSD, 2xVelociraptor 600GB 10,000 spinner in raid 0 storage....16g Gskill DDR3 2133 @2292, ATI 6850, back on huge air (quiet)....HP Laptop redone OS (ie, no HP krud  ), AMD Phenom II N620, 8gig DDR3 1333 ram, Sanddisk SataII 120GB SSD, Toshiba 500GB 7200 spinner...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|