|
-
NV30 with AGP 4X.. How bad of a performance hit?
was just reading information about i850e and i845g/e chipsets and their lack of agp 8x. i'm thinking ahead to my inevitable upgrade to NV30 and wondering how much of a performance hit i'll be taking with AGP 4x.
-
Hammerhead Shark
Re: NV30 with AGP 4X.. How bad of a performance hit?
Originally posted by Satan's Cheerleader
was just reading information about i850e and i845g/e chipsets and their lack of agp 8x. i'm thinking ahead to my inevitable upgrade to NV30 and wondering how much of a performance hit i'll be taking with AGP 4x.
From what I've read it seems that the performance gain of AGP 8x isn't nearly as big as the increas from 2x to 4x was. In fact I think that the difference between 4x and 8x is rather small. I'm willing to bet that NV30 and R300 will run just fine on 4x.
-
Folding Team Member
The performance difference between 2x and 4x is rather small as well in terms of real world numbers.
-
GO BENGALS!!!!!
It won't be a very vast improvement. I wouldn't be worried to have an 8x AGP motherboard.
-
AGP 4x isn't even fully used yet, not even with current games. By the time you will need AGP 8x it will be time to upgrade your video card again.
-
Tiger Shark
Interesting. I just took for granted that video cards were pushing the limits of AGP 4x, hence the move to AGP 8x in the next generation of cards. I did assume that having an AGP 8x mobo would not be of much benefit at first because the first few generations of AGP 8x video cards would not be able to take full advantage of it.
Anyway, as you can see, I'm no expert. I'd appreciate further explination. Educate me!
Thanks,
Low Roller
-
Sleeps with the Fishes
Originally posted by BuddMan
AGP 4x isn't even fully used yet, not even with current games. By the time you will need AGP 8x it will be time to upgrade your video card again.
correct
-
Gotta love these forums . Yeah, if you try to run in 2x in something like 3dmark, the hit is only a couple hundered points, nothing too major. But with the numbers that thing will be pulling, 200 3dmarks will be worthless. Don't worry about it. You could always use it as an excuse to get a new mobo though.....
--1700+@1661 (11x151)--PAL8045 w/Sunon 50cfm--512MB RAM--Ti4200 Turbo
Check out my site for full specs.
Coined the phrase Hammer time for the release time of AMD clawhammer and sledgehammer 
-
**** I still run my 8500 in 2x mode for pure stability because the gain in 4x is worthless. It averaged something like 100 points in SE.
-
Great White Shark
Originally posted by Low Roller
Interesting. I just took for granted that video cards were pushing the limits of AGP 4x, hence the move to AGP 8x in the next generation of cards. I did assume that having an AGP 8x mobo would not be of much benefit at first because the first few generations of AGP 8x video cards would not be able to take full advantage of it.
Anyway, as you can see, I'm no expert. I'd appreciate further explination. Educate me!
Thanks,
Low Roller
The reason you see little or no gain is this. AGP 4x is is only capable of moving 1.06GB/sec of data. This will basically double with AGP 8x to 2GB/sec. This is where the problem lies. Most video cards already have well in excess of this, pushing 6-10GB/sec for the average to high-end cards. Why in the world would you want to retrieve textures out of memory at 2GB/sec when your video card already has 3-5x that much bandwidth?
Prince of the OC Crusaders
Intel i7 3.2GHz @ 4.24GHz
Cooler Master V8
Asus P9X79 Pro
16GB Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-1600 (quad channel)
HIS R9 290X @1050MHz
Asus 20x DVD-RW DL DVD-RW
-
Heh, im running 1xAGP cause this old board is too unstable with the GF2 ti at 2x. the difference between 2x and 1x for me is around 150 marks. My best ever score was at 2x AGP but its not reliable.
Q6600 (GO), Zalman CNPS 9700, Gigabyte P35-DS3P, 4G Kingston 6400 C5, Leadtek PX 8800 GT ZL (650/1800)
2x WD 500GB SATA, ASUS + Pioneer DVRW, Antec Sonata lll case, Samsung 226BW 22"LCD, Logitech X540 7.1 speakers, Logitech G5 mouse
3GHz(9x333), stock Vcore, stock cooler
3.2GHz(8x400), +0.050vcore (gaming, 24/7)
3.6GHz(9x400), +0.150vcore (3DMark01 60769)
3.8GHz(9x422), 1.5v min(set) (3d01 62926, 3d03 42285, Crysis High 1680x1050 34fps) Ouch! She’s hot!
-
Man With Nothing To Lose
Last edited by jagojago12; 06-06-2002 at 05:52 AM.
"If everything you try works, then you are not trying hard enough." - Gordon E. Moore
Desktop:
AMD Athlon XP [email protected] (11.0x210) | EPoX EP-8RDA+ | 512MB Crucial PC3200 | VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 | nVidia SoundStorm 5.1 | 160GB 7200RPM Western Digital | 48x/12x/48x Lite-On CD-RW | Lite-On 16x DVD-RW | 19" NEC AccuSync 90
Laptop:
Intel Pentium-M 1.4GHz ULV | 512MB Nanya PC2700 | ATi Mobility Radeon 9200 | 60GB 4200RPM Toshiba | 8x/16x/10x/24x Matshita DVD/CDRW | 12.1" Sony XGA TFT
SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team
-
Great White Shark
itsnt this kinda like the way cards now have 128mb memory and i thought that i read here or somewhere that games are just now using 64 fully.
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.
LAMDA DIR (Captain)in the Cooler's Guild
BORN TO FOLD
Damn you Hillary Clinton. This is all your fault. Damn you straight to hell. I'm glad Bill cheated on you. He was a good man. You, ma'am, are a douche. - ImaNihilist
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|