KT333 Motherboard Roundup

Sharky Forums


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: KT333 Motherboard Roundup

  1. 06-18-2002, 01:02 PM #1
    Vince Freeman
    Vince Freeman is offline
    Tiger Shark Vince Freeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    528

    KT333 Motherboard Roundup

    Sharky's KT333 Motherboard Roundup is now online and ready for your perusal:

    http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardwar...le.php/1367631

    Feature comparisons, BIOS options, benchmark performance, FSB overclocking and more, it's all there!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-18-2002, 01:13 PM #2
    stereosteve99
    stereosteve99 is offline
    Catfish stereosteve99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    129
    You are the man!! Exactly what I was looking for. One question, why didn't you include the giga-byte, it ranks right under the Epox as far as performance goes, and above in some apps.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-18-2002, 01:27 PM #3
    Vince Freeman
    Vince Freeman is offline
    Tiger Shark Vince Freeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    528
    Unfortunately, some companies declined to participate, as in any large roundup.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-18-2002, 01:31 PM #4
    sapasion
    sapasion is offline
    Folding Team Member sapasion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Folding@Home
    Posts
    15,177
    nice Vince
    If I hadn't got one last month I'd get one now; an Epox that is
    My PC
    OC Crusaders
    3DMark Team
    Folding Team
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-18-2002, 01:39 PM #5
    KJY9
    KJY9 is offline
    5 Loaves and Two Fish KJY9's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Temporarily assigned to earth!
    Posts
    8,252
    Originally posted by Vince Freeman
    Unfortunately, some companies declined to participate, as in any large roundup.
    Vine, you may want to check your charts again on the "overclocking performance" section of your review. You have the A7V333 labeled A7V133...other than that..GREAT review
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-18-2002, 01:44 PM #6
    GeForce
    GeForce is offline
    The Gothic Shark GeForce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    6,063
    What happened to the Gigabyte KT333 mobo?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-18-2002, 01:52 PM #7
    Vince Freeman
    Vince Freeman is offline
    Tiger Shark Vince Freeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    528
    Originally posted by GeForce
    What happened to the Gigabyte KT333 mobo?
    See above.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-18-2002, 01:53 PM #8
    GeForce
    GeForce is offline
    The Gothic Shark GeForce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    6,063
    Originally posted by Vince Freeman


    See above.
    Ok, I missed that. Thanks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 06-18-2002, 01:53 PM #9
    Vince Freeman
    Vince Freeman is offline
    Tiger Shark Vince Freeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    528
    Originally posted by KJY9


    Vine, you may want to check your charts again on the "overclocking performance" section of your review. You have the A7V333 labeled A7V133...other than that..GREAT review
    Ah yes, a single mistake in Excel is the gift that keeps on giving.

    All fixed up now and thanks. 11,000+ words and there's bound to be a few typos.
    Last edited by Vince Freeman; 06-18-2002 at 02:19 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 06-18-2002, 02:31 PM #10
    KJY9
    KJY9 is offline
    5 Loaves and Two Fish KJY9's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Temporarily assigned to earth!
    Posts
    8,252
    Originally posted by Vince Freeman


    Ah yes, a single mistake in Excel is the gift that keeps on giving.

    All fixed up now and thanks. 11,000+ words and there's bound to be a few typos.
    He He...I didn't think you'd want that mistake up there. I know I wouldn't. All-in-all....great review! You picked my favorite of the bunch
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 06-18-2002, 04:07 PM #11
    unclescrooge
    unclescrooge is offline
    Tiger Shark unclescrooge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Somewhere South of North and North of South
    Posts
    594
    nice piece...too bad gigabyte chose not to enter. was iwill omitted for the same reason?
    "If you come to a fork in the road, take it"
    Yogi Berra.
    http://www.jchampion.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 06-18-2002, 06:56 PM #12
    ksuohio
    ksuohio is offline
    . ksuohio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,721
    Good well rounded review. I'm suprised by the performance difference in some areas which is a pleasant suprise since I picked the Epox board a long time ago when it first came out. Having an older Athlon 1.33, is it easy to increase the FSB without much tweaking? I have it up to 166 with the multi clocked down so I run at 1.50.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    - Asus M50 Laptop - C2D T9300 - 4 gig RAM - Radeon HD 3650 - Vista x64 Ultimate

    - Intel i7-3770K - Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE - 32gig RAM - Radeon HD7970 Ghz - Plextor M3 256GB/120GB OCZ Vertex3
    - LG BluRay - Razor Blackwidow Ultimate Keyboard - Logitech G9x
    - HP ZR2740w/Asus LCD - W7 Ultimate
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 06-18-2002, 11:03 PM #13
    SirRiff
    SirRiff is offline
    Sushi
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    1

    I like the soyo...

    Greetings,

    as a non-overclocker, i like the soyo. that many onboard features without the chance of conflicts is just to easy to pass up. i would love to see them come out with a revision that supports temperature monitering with the thoroughbred, maybe in a kt400 model or something? i would hate to fry a 2200+ or something....

    sirriff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 06-18-2002, 11:26 PM #14
    BremenCulhaven
    BremenCulhaven is offline
    Hammerhead Shark BremenCulhaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,301
    Interesting thing is my Western Digital 20GB 7200 ata100 HD pulled a better number than any of those boards did (think they just used the 40GB version of my drive). This drive is on my 2nd computer and uses an Epox8kha+. It scored a 765 on the PCmark2002.

    BC
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 06-18-2002, 11:49 PM #15
    Vince Freeman
    Vince Freeman is offline
    Tiger Shark Vince Freeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    528
    Originally posted by BremenCulhaven
    Interesting thing is my Western Digital 20GB 7200 ata100 HD pulled a better number than any of those boards did (think they just used the 40GB version of my drive). This drive is on my 2nd computer and uses an Epox8kha+. It scored a 765 on the PCmark2002.

    BC
    Sure and if I slap an IBM in there and the scores shoot up like mad.

    It's a funny benchmark, and it can really only be compared to your own specific HD and configuration. It doesn't seem to be a comparative speed mark that can cross system boundaries, but a very relative score.

    For that reason, this may be the last time we see it at SE.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules