Seti@home?

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Seti@home?

  1. 11-07-2002, 04:52 PM #1
    gateways_rule
    gateways_rule is offline
    GO BENGALS!!!!! gateways_rule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Ohio,USA
    Posts
    8,244

    Seti@home?

    Hey guys,
    I installed this last night and the cpu time has been over 7 hours to get to around 18%. Is that normal? I think it's going a little slow.

    Thanks!
    Last edited by gateways_rule; 11-07-2002 at 04:52 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 11-07-2002, 05:06 PM #2
    serotone9
    serotone9 is offline
    Hammerhead Shark serotone9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    ny
    Posts
    2,545

    Re: Seti@home?

    Originally posted by gateways_rule
    Hey guys,
    I installed this last night and the cpu time has been over 7 hours to get to around 18%. Is that normal? I think it's going a little slow.

    Thanks!
    are you using the command line version or the GUI version from the berkley site? (the GUI version takes a lot longer.)
    workstation: athlon xp-m [email protected] | epox 8rda+ | 512mb | seagate 80gb+160gb | arch linux
    web server: athlon xp 1600+ | epox 8k3a+ | 256mb | maxtor 30gb | debian linux
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-07-2002, 05:09 PM #3
    Shadowfire
    Shadowfire is offline
    Hammerhead Shark Shadowfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Pleasanton, CA
    Posts
    2,614
    I used to have the SETI@home Graphic version, and i could finish a whole packet in 7 hours...

    FX-62 / MSI K9N PLATINUM SLI / 2x1GB Patriot DDR2 800 / XFX 7600GT
    IBM T60 / 1.83 GHz Core Duo / 1.5 GB DDR2 667 MHz / 80 GB SATA HD / ATi X1300 64 MB / Fingerprint reader!!!



    My Heatware!!! w00t w00t, got lots of evals now!

    Proud Private Shadowfire of The Cooler's Guild

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-07-2002, 05:11 PM #4
    gateways_rule
    gateways_rule is offline
    GO BENGALS!!!!! gateways_rule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Ohio,USA
    Posts
    8,244
    The GUI Version from the Berkely site. It looks like this:
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 11-07-2002, 07:24 PM #5
    slydog
    slydog is offline
    Catfish
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    160
    lol.. ya thats a little slow.. since you just started, ditch the GUI and go get the cmd-line version. You should be doing a workload in under 10 hours with your CPU. But make sure you dont do any CPU intense things (ie gaming) while running SETI or that will slow it down also.

    Shadowfire.. yours happens to be low also. Yours should be done in about 4 hours. If your running the GUI then you should switch also.

    Here are some of my results...
    C400@500 12-13 hours
    Athlon 950 ~6 hours
    Tbird 1.4 ~4.5 hours

    slydog
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 11-07-2002, 08:27 PM #6
    ua549
    ua549 is offline
    Great White Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    21,595
    My Xeon 1.7 dual proc system does 2 WUs in approximately 4 hours. That is one per proc per 4 hours. I use the command line Seti version. Your performance should be similar depending on your proc speed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules