Better comparison shots of GFFX and 9700

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Better comparison shots of GFFX and 9700

  1. 02-02-2003, 03:30 AM #1
    steppy76
    steppy76 is offline
    Hammerhead Shark steppy76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    2,702

    Better comparison shots of GFFX and 9700

    http://home.attbi.com/~brentjustice2/index.htm

    Look at the thin green lines in the lower left near the middle.
    2004-----------------------------------------------1986
    Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
    Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
    512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
    Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
    150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
    48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
    Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-02-2003, 04:17 AM #2
    Regulator
    Regulator is offline
    Reef Shark Regulator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    420
    hmm.. If you notice there are much less jaggies with the 9700Pro 6X, in comparison with the 5800 Ultra. most notibaly in the green bars, and in the pink strips going out to the right. The only thing is, the speeds at those settings. I wonder which does faster. Ive seen the Tom's review, and overall, the FX was better, and the 9700 Pro was better in some.. Guess Ill wait till the R350.

    System 1
    -------------------------------
    Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz
    Gigabyte GA-8INXP w/533fsb and DUAL DDR
    512MB Kingston 266mhz DDR RAM (533mhz Dual DDR)
    40GB WD 400 HDD
    ATI Radeon 9800Pro 128MB
    AC'97 Integrated 6.1 Audio
    Creative Inspire 4400 4.1 Speakers
    Samsung Synchmaster 955DF Monitor

    System 2
    -------------------------------
    Pentium 4 1.5 Ghz
    Intel D850GB mobo w/400Mhz fsb
    512MB PC800 RDRAM
    40GB WD HDD
    ATI Radeon 8500LE 128MB (302/261)
    SB Live! 5.1
    Altec Lansing 251 5.1 Speakers
    SONY 40X CD-RW
    LG Studioworks 775N monitor
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-02-2003, 05:20 AM #3
    KaoTiK
    KaoTiK is offline
    Noob KaoTiK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    6,104
    Originally posted by Regulator
    hmm.. If you notice there are much less jaggies with the 9700Pro 6X, in comparison with the 5800 Ultra. most notibaly in the green bars, and in the pink strips going out to the right. The only thing is, the speeds at those settings. I wonder which does faster. Ive seen the Tom's review, and overall, the FX was better, and the 9700 Pro was better in some.. Guess Ill wait till the R350.
    However, if you notice the bars on the top left hand corner, the GeForce FX has better FSAA even when comparing its 4xS compared to the 6x of the 9700 Pro.

    But on the bottom the 9700 Pro is better...

    Weird. lol
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamakazie
    Yeah... I wasn't paying attention, I was killing trees.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-02-2003, 12:11 PM #4
    thebove
    thebove is offline
    Evil Monkey Shark thebove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    West Bloomfield, MI
    Posts
    6,819
    is it just me, or do the 6xS and 8xS modes on the GFFX look WORSE than it's 4xS mode?
    Last edited by thebove; 02-02-2003 at 12:11 PM.
    Abit IP35 Pro - Core2Duo E8400 - 4GB Crucial Ballistix 1066 - ATI 4850HD
    - 2xRaptor 150GB RAID-0

    Dave? Dave?! Dave's not here...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-02-2003, 03:59 PM #5
    Bassthe1st
    Bassthe1st is offline
    Tiger Shark Bassthe1st's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Montreal,Qc,Canada
    Posts
    986
    Have you noticed how the FX shorten the thin lines when in high AA mode? Just compare 4XAA. ATI's picture quality is way better then the FX and the lines are not shortened.
    Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 3.2Ghz, 1.16V| Asus P5Q-E | Diamond Radeon HD4870 1GB | 4GB OCZ ReaperX PC2-6400 | WD Velociraptor 300GB | SoundBlaster X-FI Titanium | Antec Three Hundred | Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Lite-on 20X burner | Samsung S23A350 23'' monitor | Logitech MX518 | Logitech Z-5500 speakers
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-02-2003, 06:23 PM #6
    KaoTiK
    KaoTiK is offline
    Noob KaoTiK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    6,104
    Originally posted by Bassthe1st
    Have you noticed how the FX shorten the thin lines when in high AA mode? Just compare 4XAA. ATI's picture quality is way better then the FX and the lines are not shortened.
    The bottom half of the pictures are definately better on the 9700 Pro, but the Top half is better on the GeForce FX. I find that odd, lol.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamakazie
    Yeah... I wasn't paying attention, I was killing trees.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules