|
-
Tiger Shark
Msi K7n2-l Vs 8rda
i will be oc a 21+ . the msi is a bit cheaper. can you change both one Vdimm . are both agp and pci locked?
i have to choose between thes two...
GA P35-DS3L
Intel E6850 C2D
Trancend aXe Ram 1066 2gb 5-5-5-15
8800gt
omega 500w psu
1xsata hdd
2xide hdd
1x sata dvd
-
Hammerhead Shark
The 8RDA has more features and IMO has greater o.c.ing potential. The MSI will give you more stabilty and dependability. You'll have to choose between those qualities.
drs1771
Main rig: i7-2600K, Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD, 16GB Kingston Hyper X 1333, 320GB Seagate Sata 3.0 X2 (Raid 0), Intel 40GB SSD Cached (Intel Rapid Storage), ATi Radeon HD5700.
"It's not the size of your sig that matters, its the size of your heatpipe..."
-
Sleeps with the Fishes
stability and dependability? Ok...I have an epox 8rda @ 190mhz fsb it has NEVER bsod'd, rebooted, slowed down or anything. I routinely keep my comp on for days on end. I don't know how you could say this board is not stable or dependable. I haven't read any reviews on the msi so I can't comment on it, nor do I have personal experience with it. I give a whole hearted recommendation for the 8rda though
Last edited by talldude; 02-24-2003 at 01:18 AM.
-
Tiger Shark
[H]ardOCP just reviewed the K7N2, they're saying good stuff about it. And I LOVE mine.
Main Rig
+ AthlonXP 2500+ Barton (early week, unlocked); cooled by SLK900A w/ 92mm 64cfm fan + The Uberduct
+ 200x11, 1.725vcore, 2.7vdimm for everyday use; 210x11, 1.825vcore, 2.8vdimm max stable overclock
+ Abit NF7-S rev2 (Vantec Iceberq on NB)
+ 1x512MB Buffalo Tech PC3200 (CH-5)
+ Radeon 9500 Pro awaiting it's overclock
+ Seagate Barracuda 80GB 8MB cache 7200RPM HD#1
+ Western Digital 60GB 2MB cache 5400rpm HD#2
+ LG 52x CDRW
+ Samsung 32x CDROM
+ Allied 400W PSU
+ NEC FE991SB 19"
+ WindowsXP Proffesional
+ Sennheiser HD212 PROs
Private Jagermeister of the Cooler's Guild.
-
Tiger Shark
I'll vote for EP-8RDA. I can't comment on MSI K7N2-L, because I don't own one. But based on my own experience, EP-8RDA has a lot of OCing potential needless to say the stability and dependability that Epox has shown on this great board. It's an awesome board for both OCers and NonOCers. You should definitely check it out.
-
Originally posted by drs1771
The 8RDA has more features and IMO has greater o.c.ing potential. The MSI will give you more stabilty and dependability. You'll have to choose between those qualities.
I owned a few MSI´s and non of them featured stabilty and dependability and certainly not straight out of the box. Some of them were kind of OK after a long period of setting the system up but still, my asus boards will make them bite the dust for sure.
If the choice would be up to me I would choose the Epox but I never worked with that board myself so I can´t tell from my own experience. It´s just that MSI as given me so much trouble.
I have heard good things about the Epox though exept for some problems with the BIOS. I hope someone can elaborate more on that subject.
Last edited by 2March; 02-24-2003 at 12:50 PM.
Fold in...
Fold out...
-
Mako Shark
i would personally go with the epox because of more overclocking potential... ive worked with both boards ( actually the only two boards companies ived worked with) and the MSI is an awsome motherboard.. but not big on overclocking in compaired to Epox
System 1:
Asus P5B Deluxe | Intel Core2Duo E6300 | (2x1gig) Patriot Extreme Performance PC2-8500 | MSI GeForce 260GTX | Samsung SyncMaster 225bw | Western Digital 640GB Caviar SE16 | LG DVD 16x | LG CDRW 52x24x52x | Windows XP Professional | Creative Labs Inspire T5400 5.1 Speaker System | Powered by PC Power & Cooling 750w | Coolermaster Stacker 830 SE | Cool by Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme Aluminum Heatsink
-
Tiger Shark
Originally posted by drs1771
The 8RDA has more features and IMO has greater o.c.ing potential. The MSI will give you more stabilty and dependability. You'll have to choose between those qualities.
this seems pretty accurate i did lots of reading on these 2 boards
and the epox will give you more trouble it seems
i know there are perfectly happy epox owners but lots of RMAs also
i had to make this same call
i went with MSI
-
Tiger Shark
the choice is tougher thab i thought. hmmm. I am still a bit undecided......I am just scared of getting a epox, that i have to rma.
GA P35-DS3L
Intel E6850 C2D
Trancend aXe Ram 1066 2gb 5-5-5-15
8800gt
omega 500w psu
1xsata hdd
2xide hdd
1x sata dvd
-
Mako Shark
I've had excellent personal experience with Abit.
Biostar TA 880 / AMD Phenom 55 BE UNLOCKED x4
4 Gigs Corsair
Arctic Freezer 64 Pro Cooling- Idle 42C-Load 48C
Coolermaster Pro 600 power supply
Coolermaster Cavalier ATX Case
Western Digital 250 Gig SATA3 HDD/OS Vista Business SP2
Galaxy GT 240 512 DDR5
Samsung Writemaster w/Lightscribe
HP 25"
Logitech G5
Klipsch Promedia 2.1's
-
Expensive Sushi
Alot of people are complaining about their 8RDAs arriving DOA -that or these ppl have no clue what they are doing I don't know I wouldn't risk ordering the board from newegg get it from somewhere else if you decide to go with it.
-
Hammerhead Shark
i just ran over 1600 loops of burn in wizard in stress mode with 0 problems while i was at work at 208fsb, i am working on getting 215 perfectly stable, do you see a problem here?
Alpha Dir of The Coolers Guild
System 1:
Athlon XP 2400+ Mobile 243x10.5 (everyday use)
SLK-900a w/92mm Tornado
Radeon 9700pro 405/355
DFI Infinity Ultra
2x256mb Twinmos PC3700
80GB Segate 7200 8MB Cache
Klipsch Promedia 4.1's
Radeon 9700Pro - 19975 3dmark Compare
System 2:
Athlon XP 2600+ 166x13
AX-7 w/80mm 50cfm Sunon
ATI Radeon 8500LE
Epox 8RDA v1.1
2x256MB Kingston HyperX PC3000
Looking to buy: Retail HSF off of a BFG 5900nu
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|