Cpu heat?

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Cpu heat?

  1. 04-06-2003, 02:41 PM #1
    JoJo boy
    JoJo boy is offline
    Tiger Shark JoJo boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    608

    Cpu heat?

    Which chip is runs cooler a 2400px or a 2500xp. The 2500 has a lower chip speed but is the barton a cooler chip or not?
    Shuttle SN25P | CPU:X2 4400+ | MB:Shuttle nForce4 Ultra | HD:Spinpoint F3 500GB, Seagate 250GB | DVD+/-WR:Pioneer DL | RAM:2GB 3200 Corsair XMS | VGA:AMD 4670 512-MB | Sound:Z-5500, X-530 &Via Envy24PT | Mouse:MX510 | LCD:LG 23", Princeton 19" | OS:Win 7
    3d Mark:01 26799 | 03 11804 | 05 5476
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-07-2003, 01:58 AM #2
    Lord Vetinari
    Lord Vetinari is offline
    Mako Shark Lord Vetinari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Worthing Sussex England
    Posts
    3,561
    Suspect the Barton would as it has a slightly larger surface area. Would depend as well what the default voltages are- Know the XP2400 is 1.65V not sure what the Barton is.
    However I think any difference would be minimal.
    Newest comp DFI nf2 ultra xp1500-m @223*10.5 or XP2500-M barton @230*10.5
    new comp- 8RDA+, xp2100 TbredB @202*11, 2*twinmos 3200 (non winbond), 9700 pro, Maxtor 9 plus 80gb &120GB, Hitachi CML174SWB 17" LCD
    Old comp KT7A Axia 1ghz @1.38GHZ,
    GF3 ti200, Compaq 910 19" Monitor
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-07-2003, 02:00 AM #3
    KaoTiK
    KaoTiK is offline
    Noob KaoTiK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    6,104
    The Barton probably is, it seems as AMD's CPUs get more advanced, they get a lot cooler running. Like afore mentioned, any difference would be too small to worry about, If you're wondering about heat because of overclocking, the 2500+ would blow the 2400+ away for overclocking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamakazie
    Yeah... I wasn't paying attention, I was killing trees.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-07-2003, 02:52 AM #4
    VertigoLabs
    VertigoLabs is offline
    Tiger Shark VertigoLabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    525
    i would say they run about the same
    Last edited by VertigoLabs; 04-07-2003 at 02:54 AM.
    Motherboard ----------epox 8rda+
    CPU ------------------------1.7V TbredB2100+ @ 166 =2700+
    Memory-------------------Hyperx PC2700 5-2-2-2
    Videocard----------------ATI 9500 PRO retail stock for now
    Hard Drive ---------------Maxtor 40 gig 7200rpm
    Heatsink/fan-------------Vantec Aeroflow TMD fan
    Casefan--------------------Thermatake smartfan 1
    Case------------------------Antec SLK2600AMB *300watt*
    CPU 43C under load
    3DMark2001 12873
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-07-2003, 11:39 AM #5
    Moridin
    Moridin is offline
    Great White Shark Moridin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    5,351
    I would say the Barton would be a little cooler. AFAIK, there is no substantial changes in the core other then the additional cache. Unless there are some important changes, the lower clocked chip is usually cooler.

    Barton likely needs a little more power to run it's FSB at a higher clock rate, but that is probably more then made up for by the large cache reducing the need to go off chip. The extra cache itself does not use much power.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules