To all those wanting a 9600 or a 5600 - Page 2

Sharky Forums


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: To all those wanting a 9600 or a 5600

  1. 06-10-2003, 08:23 PM #16
    soupnazi
    soupnazi is offline
    Zoom-Zoom! soupnazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    15,097
    Originally posted by elite73
    Theres no way youve got the 4600 in the right place and Im not saying that just coz I own one. I have seen it with my own eyes outperform a 9500Pro on nearly everything (maybe 5% of current games with full FSAA on and max details being the exception and Im not even convinced at that).
    Quite a while back I saw many reviews stating that the 9500pro beats the Ti4600 WITH AA & AF enabled. The Ti4600 beats the 9500pro WITHOUT AA & AF enabled.
    Spoiler
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-10-2003, 08:33 PM #17
    elite73
    elite73 is offline
    Tiger Shark elite73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Manchester UK and Costa del Sol Spain
    Posts
    899
    Originally posted by soupnazi


    Quite a while back I saw many reviews stating that the 9500pro beats the Ti4600 WITH AA & AF enabled. The Ti4600 beats the 9500pro WITHOUT AA & AF enabled.
    Dont know I just glanced over the benchmarks at Anandtech and theyve got the 4600 beating the 9500Pro on all benchmarks with and without FSAA except for one.

    Not that it matters really I just thought Id mention the 4600 was in the wrong place in the line up.
    Last edited by elite73; 06-10-2003 at 08:33 PM.

    Current Gaming System :
    {Intel Wolfdale E8400@3600 400*9 1.275v}
    {Xigmatek HDT S1284 Rev.B Cooler}
    {Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS4}
    {4x2048MB OCZ HPC Reaper 8500 - 1000mhz@4-5-5-15-54}
    {Xigamtek Midgard Case & 700W NOX Urano PSU}
    {2xStriped Seagate 7200.11 500GB}
    {Gigabyte GTX 275 OC}
    {Soundblaster X-Fi Fatal1ty Gamer Pro}
    SONAF Clan Website
    My Homepage
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-10-2003, 11:22 PM #18
    Derringer
    Derringer is offline
    Hammerhead Shark Derringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wouldn't you want to know?
    Posts
    2,247
    Yes, I was basing it on FSAA and AA and AF and all that other good stuff.

    The current rig that 0wnz:
    Antec 2650|A64 3200+|ECS 755-A2|1gb Kingston Value RAM|17" Samsung 730b|Gigabyte 6600GT|8x DVD-RW|160 GB Seagate HD|250 GB external

    The rig that 0wned:
    HP Pavilion 9800|1.3ghz P4|384 RDRAM|Radeon 9000pro 128 MB|15" monitor (12" viewable )|30 gig HD|Windows ME (Cheaper than Windows 98!)|12 DVD-ROM|52/24/52 CD-RW|Nice buttons


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-10-2003, 11:33 PM #19
    lonewolfroger
    lonewolfroger is offline
    Great White Shark lonewolfroger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,214
    I would edit it and put pro on the 9500, 9600 and ultra on the 5600. I believe the 4200 does better then the non pro ones.
    i7 920 @3GH, P6T Deluxe V2, OCZ HP 6GB(3x2)Kit(7-7-7-16), 128GB Patriot SSD, 250GB SATA(7200)Hitachi, WD 500gb, 1000W BFG PSU, SATA Pioneer DVD CD burner, XFX5870 XXX edition(900/1300), LG LED 2350V, XFI Titanium Fatal1ty champion, Logitech X-540, Lian Li PC-B70 Full Tower Case, Win7 HP.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-11-2003, 04:19 AM #20
    Seventh Order
    Seventh Order is offline
    Tiger Shark Seventh Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    BC. Canada
    Posts
    570
    Originally posted by elite73


    Dont know I just glanced over the benchmarks at Anandtech and theyve got the 4600 beating the 9500Pro on all benchmarks with and without FSAA except for one.

    Not that it matters really I just thought Id mention the 4600 was in the wrong place in the line up.
    Please don't be offended. I just don't think 4600 is beating the 9500Pro. Those benchmarks were tested back in Nov. 2002 with the Cat 2.4. I think with the newest Cat (3.4) the situation will be different. Don't even mention 9500 Pro is a DirectX 9.0 card. The gap will only become wider and larger.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5556042
    Last edited by Seventh Order; 06-11-2003 at 04:25 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-11-2003, 04:29 AM #21
    lonewolfroger
    lonewolfroger is offline
    Great White Shark lonewolfroger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,214
    The 9500pro is a good performer, its a shame ATI discontinued it.
    i7 920 @3GH, P6T Deluxe V2, OCZ HP 6GB(3x2)Kit(7-7-7-16), 128GB Patriot SSD, 250GB SATA(7200)Hitachi, WD 500gb, 1000W BFG PSU, SATA Pioneer DVD CD burner, XFX5870 XXX edition(900/1300), LG LED 2350V, XFI Titanium Fatal1ty champion, Logitech X-540, Lian Li PC-B70 Full Tower Case, Win7 HP.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-11-2003, 04:52 AM #22
    Seventh Order
    Seventh Order is offline
    Tiger Shark Seventh Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    BC. Canada
    Posts
    570
    Well, market gimmick~
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules