Radeon 9100 IGP??? It's about time!

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Radeon 9100 IGP??? It's about time!

  1. #1
    Hammerhead Shark drs1771's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Spanish Fork, Utah
    Posts
    1,609

    Radeon 9100 IGP??? It's about time!

    http://www.neoseeker.com/news/articl...Hardware/2632/

    This will bring an economical solution to the masses.. The MX440 board will surely go by the wayside now! Finally entry level p.c.'s will be able to deliver reasonable gaming experience... Great news for retailers.
    drs1771
    Main rig: i7-2600K, Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD, 16GB Kingston Hyper X 1333, 320GB Seagate Sata 3.0 X2 (Raid 0), Intel 40GB SSD Cached (Intel Rapid Storage), ATi Radeon HD5700.


    "It's not the size of your sig that matters, its the size of your heatpipe..."

  2. #2
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,132
    Here is a preview of that chipset for anyone interested:

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...624/index.html


    It certainly looks interesting looks interesting ofr the market in general



    Peace.

  3. #3
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,383
    The 9100 IGP is the best integrated video avilable.
    But if you think it will get to Redeon9100 levels than you are wrong.
    It only has 2 randering piplines (not 4) so it would be much slower then then the 9100 and even slower then the 9000.
    C2Q 6700 - Asus P5Q turbo
    4G RAM OCZ - 1T HD Seagate
    Sapphire 4870 512MB - LG DVD RW
    Antac 300 - Corsair 550W - Logitech G5
    -=RaVeN-LoRD=-

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark Royal Oaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Jessica Alba's throat
    Posts
    2,526
    Originally posted by RavenLord
    The 9100 IGP is the best integrated video avilable.
    But if you think it will get to Redeon9100 levels than you are wrong.
    It only has 2 randering piplines (not 4) so it would be much slower then then the 9100 and even slower then the 9000.
    Yea, this is what I feared. I would love to see a board which will have an IGP that games BF with reasonable FPS. However, I don't think we'll get there soon enough. After reading the first post, I knew there had to be a catch, because in my mind it seems there is always a drawback with IGP.
    Pyro's Updated 3dmark01/03 Guide
    "It takes time and study to undo the effects of evolutionary teachings"

    |:~T-Bred B~:| |:~nForce2~:| |:~GF4 Ti4600~:|

  5. #5
    Catfish aj1788's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    180
    this looks interesting from.... intel extreme graphics 2..

    High-performance 3D

    256-bit internal path
    32bpp/ 24ZorW/ 8 Stencil
    DX7*/DX8*/OGL*1.1
    DXTn texture compression
    Up to 4 textures / pixel on a single pass
    Cubic reflection map
    Embossed/DOT3 bump mapping
    Multi-texture
    DOT3 bump-mapping
    Point sprites
    Custom Built
    Asus Vento Case(black)
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Socket 939
    Chaintech Nforce 4 Ultra MB
    1GB Corsair XMS PC3200
    80GB Cuda
    ATI x700pro 256ddr3 PCI-e

  6. #6
    Hammerhead Shark drs1771's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Spanish Fork, Utah
    Posts
    1,609
    Originally posted by RavenLord
    The 9100 IGP is the best integrated video avilable.
    But if you think it will get to Redeon9100 levels than you are wrong.
    It only has 2 randering piplines (not 4) so it would be much slower then then the 9100 and even slower then the 9000.

    Hmm.. your're right. Why bother with the 9100 engine then? Oh well.. ANYTHING beats an IGP Mx440..
    drs1771
    Main rig: i7-2600K, Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3-iSSD, 16GB Kingston Hyper X 1333, 320GB Seagate Sata 3.0 X2 (Raid 0), Intel 40GB SSD Cached (Intel Rapid Storage), ATi Radeon HD5700.


    "It's not the size of your sig that matters, its the size of your heatpipe..."

  7. #7
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    541
    Originally posted by Royal Oaks


    Yea, this is what I feared. I would love to see a board which will have an IGP that games BF with reasonable FPS. However, I don't think we'll get there soon enough. After reading the first post, I knew there had to be a catch, because in my mind it seems there is always a drawback with IGP.
    The performance of IGP is not a killer concern since no matter how good they are, they lag behind the discrete component video card like GForce or Radeon cards. You will always install a better and faster card anyway.

    It is the convenience that matters. Cheaper, fast enough and do the job.

  8. #8
    Great White Shark lonewolfroger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,214
    I think MB companies are doing the best they can to put the best onboard video they can on their MB`s, these MB`s are mostly aimed at the oem market and keeping the price of the MB down is the main concern.
    i7 920 @3GH, P6T Deluxe V2, OCZ HP 6GB(3x2)Kit(7-7-7-16), 128GB Patriot SSD, 250GB SATA(7200)Hitachi, WD 500gb, 1000W BFG PSU, SATA Pioneer DVD CD burner, XFX5870 XXX edition(900/1300), LG LED 2350V, XFI Titanium Fatal1ty champion, Logitech X-540, Lian Li PC-B70 Full Tower Case, Win7 HP.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •