|
-
Reef Shark
Samsung LCD??
Hi, I am currently looking into these two 17" LCDs, 172T & 173T.
They have exactly the same specs, except that the 173T is 700:1 contrast, while the 172T is only 500:1. I mean.....is there a big difference between the contrast rate (only by 200)?? Personally, I think the 172T looks better becoz its base stand is bigger. But, performance-wise, what do you guys think?? Which one should I go for it?
Oh and by da way, 173T is cheaper than 172T, by about $75 dollars. =)
PC:
Thermaltake Tsunami Dream VA3000 SWA | OCZ Modstream 520W | SAMSUNG 173T | Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe | AMD 64 3200+ Winchester | G. Skill PC4400 DDR550 1G LE Dual Channel Kit @ 2.5-3-3-7/1T | ATI X850XT PCI-E | WD 200GB 7200RPM 8MB | Seagate 160G SATA/NCQ (RAID0) | NEC ND-3520A | M-Audio Revolution 7.1 | Cooler Master CoolDrive3 | Nexus 3.5" & 5.25" Silver Fan Controller | Altec Lansing 2100 Slim Speaker System Enhanced
HTPC:
Antec Aria | Asus A7N8X-VM(400) | XP2800+ | 2x 512MB Kingston ValueRam PC3200 | ATI 9700Pro | NEC ND-2500A | Logitech MX DUO
**I HATE SCHOOLS.........REALLY, I DO!**
-
Reef Shark
Can anyone please give me some advise?
PC:
Thermaltake Tsunami Dream VA3000 SWA | OCZ Modstream 520W | SAMSUNG 173T | Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe | AMD 64 3200+ Winchester | G. Skill PC4400 DDR550 1G LE Dual Channel Kit @ 2.5-3-3-7/1T | ATI X850XT PCI-E | WD 200GB 7200RPM 8MB | Seagate 160G SATA/NCQ (RAID0) | NEC ND-3520A | M-Audio Revolution 7.1 | Cooler Master CoolDrive3 | Nexus 3.5" & 5.25" Silver Fan Controller | Altec Lansing 2100 Slim Speaker System Enhanced
HTPC:
Antec Aria | Asus A7N8X-VM(400) | XP2800+ | 2x 512MB Kingston ValueRam PC3200 | ATI 9700Pro | NEC ND-2500A | Logitech MX DUO
**I HATE SCHOOLS.........REALLY, I DO!**
-
Reef Shark
From what Ive heard, you dont want anything less than 600:1 for Gaming.
-
I purchased a 172T 2 months ago and I love it! Great display with great colors. However, be very wary of the listed contrast ratios. The numbers can be deceiving! I think it was over at tomshardware that they tested the actual contrast ratio of lcd's and let me tell you, some numbers were way off. However, the 172T's ratio was higher than advertised. The best way to see if there is a difference would be a visual comparison.
A64 3000+ @2.1Ghz @1.7V
Asus K8V Deluxe
2x512 Samsung @210Mhz 2.5-3-3-6
Sapphire 9800 Pro @ 425
Audigy 2ZS
Logitech Z-680 & Z-5300
Seagate 120gig 7200rpm 8meg
6X Hitachi DVD
12x/8x/32x LG CD-R
Linksys 10/100
Samsung 172T & 570V
Scientific Atlanta Cable Modem
Logitech MX Duo
Antec Sonata
www.irydium.net/3dmark
3DMark 2001: 20241
Averatec 3150H
Athlon xp-M 1600+
256 meg pc2100
30 Gig HD
12.1 XGA TFT
dvd/cd-r
-
take a look at the 172X
better for games 16ms response and they claim it has 24bit display
My first PC...Apple //e 1982
Then a Mac
switch 1-Amiga 2000
switch 2-386SX
Then 486 DX4 100
Then PIII 500
Then P4 2.53B
Now (upgraded)
2.4 AMDX2 ,ASUS SLI ,nf4ultra,2G DDR400
X1900XT,2x Raptors 74 in raid 0,300G MAXTOR SATA2/16cache/ncq ,Lian-Liv1000,Enermax 600WATT,NEC 16x DVDr,SB aud.card,BlueTooth keyb+mouse
Coming soon
Quad core Intel
-
Reef Shark
Originally posted by sna
take a look at the 172X
better for games 16ms response and they claim it has 24bit display
Yeah I know, but the 172X is only 0.294mm for its Pixel pitch, and for LCD is better to have a 0.26mm pixel pitch.
PC:
Thermaltake Tsunami Dream VA3000 SWA | OCZ Modstream 520W | SAMSUNG 173T | Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe | AMD 64 3200+ Winchester | G. Skill PC4400 DDR550 1G LE Dual Channel Kit @ 2.5-3-3-7/1T | ATI X850XT PCI-E | WD 200GB 7200RPM 8MB | Seagate 160G SATA/NCQ (RAID0) | NEC ND-3520A | M-Audio Revolution 7.1 | Cooler Master CoolDrive3 | Nexus 3.5" & 5.25" Silver Fan Controller | Altec Lansing 2100 Slim Speaker System Enhanced
HTPC:
Antec Aria | Asus A7N8X-VM(400) | XP2800+ | 2x 512MB Kingston ValueRam PC3200 | ATI 9700Pro | NEC ND-2500A | Logitech MX DUO
**I HATE SCHOOLS.........REALLY, I DO!**
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|