OC'ing noob with 200x11 @ 38c.....

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: OC'ing noob with 200x11 @ 38c.....

  1. #1
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,019

    OC'ing noob with 200x11 @ 38c.....

    have a barton 2500 with AGXEA stepping

    i successfully OC'd to 200x11 at 38c, my fsb/dram ratio is on auto-synch so my ddr433 rated ram is running ddr400

    im feeling confident enough to step it up a bit so how should i do this?
    216x11= 2376Mhz/ddr432 is what i was going to do but wanted verification if this is best...

    also can someone point me to some good benchmark/stability/cpu temp programs?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Great White Shark lonewolfroger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,214
    As far as a benchmark program, sisoft sandra, a temp and voltage program MBM5. Having your ram set on Auto may hinder your OC, set it on one of these in bio`s 6/6, 5/5, as long as it is equal too 1/1.
    i7 920 @3GH, P6T Deluxe V2, OCZ HP 6GB(3x2)Kit(7-7-7-16), 128GB Patriot SSD, 250GB SATA(7200)Hitachi, WD 500gb, 1000W BFG PSU, SATA Pioneer DVD CD burner, XFX5870 XXX edition(900/1300), LG LED 2350V, XFI Titanium Fatal1ty champion, Logitech X-540, Lian Li PC-B70 Full Tower Case, Win7 HP.

  3. #3
    Running Man mystifmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    6,033
    Running SiSoft Sandra, SuperPi, 3D Mark, ect will work nicely to test stability. 216Mhz might be less than you can do while maintaining stability, you just won't know until you try. Just keep raising the FSB slowly until you become unstable (computer crashes, or benchmarks won't run) then back off until stable. Once you reach your highest possible FSB try raising your multiplier a bit until it becomes unstable, then back off until stable. You should still have some head room with that chip. Good Luck

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,019
    ok, i tried 216mhz and windows didnt want to boot
    doing 5/5 and 6/6 didnt help either

    what is the difference between auto synch, 5/5, and 6/6?

  5. #5
    Great White Shark Un4given's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT United States
    Posts
    22,553
    Originally posted by eon
    ok, i tried 216mhz and windows didnt want to boot
    doing 5/5 and 6/6 didnt help either

    what is the difference between auto synch, 5/5, and 6/6?
    There is no difference between 5/5 and 6/6, they are both 1:1 ratios. As for your system o/c, it's not really a good idea to jump in increments that big. Going from 200MHz FSB to 216MHz FSB with a multi of 11 is a jump of 176MHz. You should push upwards in smaller increments of 2-3 MHz and then test for stability.

    It is also likely that you are going to have to increase the VCore long before you hit 216MHz FSB, even if your CPU can run at that speed. You may also need to bump the VDIMM a bit as well.
    Prince of the OC Crusaders

    Intel i7 3.2GHz @ 4.24GHz
    Cooler Master V8
    Asus P9X79 Pro
    16GB Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-1600 (quad channel)
    HIS R9 290X @1050MHz
    Asus 20x DVD-RW DL DVD-RW

  6. #6
    ATI Fanboy Ignitionator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Error 03983 - Invalid User
    Posts
    5,225
    when you put it at 216Mhz FSB, did you try raising the CPU vcore and DIMM voltage?
    .:|:. Thermaltake Xaser II A5000A Case
    .:|:. OCZ PowerStream 470W PSU
    .:|:. Chaintech VNF3-250 nForce3 250
    .:|:. AMD64 3000+ 2.0Ghz @ 2410Mhz
    .:|:. Zalman CNPS7000-Cu Copper HSF
    .:|:. OCZ 1GB PC-3500 EB Platinum Edition @ 240Mhz 3-2-2-10 (2.9V)
    .:|:. ATI Radeon x800 Pro 256MB @ 530Mhz/560Mhz
    .:|:. Creative Audigy 2 ZS
    .:|:. Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultras


    3DMark01 - 25617

    Join Fix-it.org Forums!

  7. #7
    Hammerhead Shark
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,019
    Originally posted by Ignitionator
    when you put it at 216Mhz FSB, did you try raising the CPU vcore and DIMM voltage?
    no....

    as of now im at 205x11 with 1.7v....just did about a hour of gaming and had no problems and im about to do prime to test

    would i even have to up the DIMM volts? they arent even at 433mhz, the rated speed

    my goal is 2350-2400:
    which is a better way to get there, a 216x11 or a 200x12

  8. #8
    Running Man mystifmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    6,033
    Originally posted by eon

    my goal is 2350-2400:
    which is a better way to get there, a 216x11 or a 200x12
    You will gain more performance from 216x11, but it's a matter of hitting that speed. Try to very slighty adjust you voltages to see if you can get a higher overclock stable (higher than 205FSB).

  9. #9
    Hammerhead Shark Saffire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,984
    AGXEA? I guess you mean AQXEA.

    Lower your multiplier a bit and put it to 216, then see if it boots. If it does, then you'll have to up your vcore for 216x11.
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || DFI Lanparty UT Ultra-D || 2gb OCZ PC3200 || ATi Radeon X1900XT || Western Digital 74gb Raptor || Dell 2001fp || Seasonic S12 600W

  10. #10
    Great White Shark Un4given's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT United States
    Posts
    22,553
    Originally posted by eon
    no....

    as of now im at 205x11 with 1.7v....just did about a hour of gaming and had no problems and im about to do prime to test

    would i even have to up the DIMM volts? they arent even at 433mhz, the rated speed

    my goal is 2350-2400:
    which is a better way to get there, a 216x11 or a 200x12
    Doesn't matter whether the memory is rated for that or not. Some memory modules still say you need to 2.7V+ to maintain rated speeds.
    Prince of the OC Crusaders

    Intel i7 3.2GHz @ 4.24GHz
    Cooler Master V8
    Asus P9X79 Pro
    16GB Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-1600 (quad channel)
    HIS R9 290X @1050MHz
    Asus 20x DVD-RW DL DVD-RW

  11. #11
    Hammerhead Shark japin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Allentown, PA
    Posts
    1,880
    Originally posted by Un4given
    Doesn't matter whether the memory is rated for that or not. Some memory modules still say you need to 2.7V+ to maintain rated speeds.
    I have to agree on this one... i have memory rated at 370mhz and it does 422 with no issues... then again, you can have lower quality memory modules that are rated 433mhz will only do 410mhz... like was said earlier... drop your mulitplier low... like 8x and just keep raising the FSB like 5mhz at first (till you hit a wall (like no post)) then drop it and keep trying till you get one that loads windows... next step is to test the stabilty of the memory once in windows (i personally like sisoft sandra's burn-in test(i have found that you only need to run normal stress 999 times to test true stability, i have never had one crash with memory if i run it on normal 999 times and it passes))
    Alpha Dir of The Coolers Guild

    System 1:
    Athlon XP 2400+ Mobile 243x10.5 (everyday use)
    SLK-900a w/92mm Tornado
    Radeon 9700pro 405/355
    DFI Infinity Ultra
    2x256mb Twinmos PC3700
    80GB Segate 7200 8MB Cache
    Klipsch Promedia 4.1's

    Radeon 9700Pro - 19975 3dmark Compare

    System 2:
    Athlon XP 2600+ 166x13
    AX-7 w/80mm 50cfm Sunon
    ATI Radeon 8500LE
    Epox 8RDA v1.1
    2x256MB Kingston HyperX PC3000


    Looking to buy: Retail HSF off of a BFG 5900nu

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •