XP on a 233mhz comput

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: XP on a 233mhz comput

  1. #1
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    64

    XP on a 233mhz comput

    Hey guys would you think that xp pro would work fine on the 233 machine you see at the bottom of the thread or should i just stick to 98se or ME or windows 2000...please help me out

  2. #2
    Hammerhead Shark purewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,392
    I had XP on my old Dell Laptop which was a P1 166MMX, 72MB of RAM, 2.1GB HDD. It was a bit slow but it worked just fine for me, even used to play red alert on it.

    Thing One: Core2Duo E7200 @ 3.6GHz//2x2GB OCZ DDR2 800//Asus P5Q Pro//ATi HD 4850 PCI-E//ATI TV-Wonder HD650//500GB SATA Caviar Black HDD//12x LiteOn DVD-RW//22" Acer LCD Widescreen


    Thing Two: 1.6GHz Atom//1024MB SODIMM//160GB HDD//intel Graphics//8.9" LCD Screen
    ____________________
    Heatware Evals 19-0-0

  3. #3
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    64
    thanks purwire i could try it out i guess but if its too slow i could just put 98se on it unless anyone out there has any other ideas?

  4. #4
    Hammerhead Shark nanokooshball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    'Burbs of Chicago
    Posts
    1,853
    if it runs xp too slow i reccomend 2000...DO NOT put ME on it....if 2000s too slow just put 98se
    Primary Rig
    Dell Latitude D820 || Intel Core Duo T2300E @ 1.66ghz || 1024mb PC5400 Ram || Nvidia Quadro NVS m110 256mb (Geforce Go 7300) || 80 GB 5400 RPM HD || DVD-RW Combo Drive || 15.4" WXGA Screen


    Secondary Rig
    AMD Athlon 64 3300+ @ 2.64 Ghz || 768 mb PC3200 DDR Ram || Biostar Nforce 4 Socket 754 || ATI Radeon X850 Pro 256mb @ 580 core/1200 mem|| Western Digital 160 GB 7200 HD || 48x DVD-RW

  5. #5
    Catfish Spike671's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    138
    why don't you invest into some cheapo ram cause 288... that's pretty lame. Get some value ram it'll get the job done well if you're not planing to upgrade any time soon that is.

  6. #6
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    64
    no the 288 is my famly computer thats the main one..i know its out dated its about 3 years old...anyways the computer i wanna use is the 233mhz machine that i got for free from my school with only 128mb of ram i just wanna surf the web, use the audio for my sound system and proble chat with it NO GAMEING that would be stupid. (old video card also)

  7. #7
    Hammerhead Shark Russell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    2,826
    On that machine I would use Win98. If you must use WinXP, do it with ALL the graphics enhancements turned completely off.

    Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 400x8 1.37v
    Zalman CNPS9500
    ASUS P5k Deluxe WiFi-AP
    4x1GB Buffalo Firestix PC2-6400 @ 4-4-3-11 800mHz (3327MB shows up in Windows)
    500GB Seagate 7200.10
    eVGA 8800GTS 640MB (A3 stepping) @ 700/1080
    700W OCZ GameXStream
    Antec P182 (sooo quiet with all fans at low)
    22" Dell E228WFP Widescreen LCD
    Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit
    3dMark06 Score with above OC: 11321

  8. #8
    Avanti gkline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    5,974
    use 98SE
    1.asrock z68 extr4;2500k@4400;cm hyper212+;2-5850crossfire;8g gskillddr3-1600;cru300ssd sata3-64g,wdb500gsata3;x-fi titanium fatality pro;antec tpII 750w;win7-64 hp;hannsg hh241
    2asus p8z68-v pro/gen3 ;2500k@4426;corsair h60;sapphire 6950;intel x-25m-80g;intelx25-v40g;samsng f3 500g;8g gskill ddr3;asus xonar dx pci-e;win7 hp64;antec grn 750W;acer 23"

  9. #9
    Hammerhead Shark purewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,392
    It'll work, trust me. Give it a try. Unless you plan on doing something crazy like video editing it'll run fine. This is experiance talking. On some computers you may need a BIOS update, but it's alot less likely than MS would like you to believe. XP will basically scale itself down.
    Last edited by purewire; 06-20-2004 at 02:02 PM.

    Thing One: Core2Duo E7200 @ 3.6GHz//2x2GB OCZ DDR2 800//Asus P5Q Pro//ATi HD 4850 PCI-E//ATI TV-Wonder HD650//500GB SATA Caviar Black HDD//12x LiteOn DVD-RW//22" Acer LCD Widescreen


    Thing Two: 1.6GHz Atom//1024MB SODIMM//160GB HDD//intel Graphics//8.9" LCD Screen
    ____________________
    Heatware Evals 19-0-0

  10. #10
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    64
    here i made a new thread with a poll cast ur vote for which one i should use http://www.sharkyforums.com/showthre...hreadid=239556
    Last edited by hubes44; 06-20-2004 at 02:19 PM.

  11. #11
    Hammerhead Shark Russell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    2,826
    Originally posted by purewire
    It'll work, trust me. Give it a try. Unless you plan on doing something crazy like video editing it'll run fine. This is experiance talking. On some computers you may need a BIOS update, but it's alot less likely than MS would like you to believe. XP will basically scale itself down.

    Oh, no doubt it'll work. My 300A Celeron worked great with XP. It ran like crap at first, then I tweaked services, virtual memory, and startup items and it ran great. I could even leave most of the visual effects on with no trouble. I had 192MB of RAM.

    For most people though, XP on a system that speed would run like a dog.
    Last edited by Russell; 06-20-2004 at 05:35 PM.

    Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 400x8 1.37v
    Zalman CNPS9500
    ASUS P5k Deluxe WiFi-AP
    4x1GB Buffalo Firestix PC2-6400 @ 4-4-3-11 800mHz (3327MB shows up in Windows)
    500GB Seagate 7200.10
    eVGA 8800GTS 640MB (A3 stepping) @ 700/1080
    700W OCZ GameXStream
    Antec P182 (sooo quiet with all fans at low)
    22" Dell E228WFP Widescreen LCD
    Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit
    3dMark06 Score with above OC: 11321

  12. #12
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    64
    russel what tweaks do u recomend?

  13. #13
    Hammerhead Shark purewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,392
    duh, the tweaks. i do them automatically now and don't think to mention them. first you want to set your virtual memory to something like 1.5x as much memory as you have. turn off any services you don't use. take all the automatic startup software off and only run when you need them. if you're like me you'll also want to go to classic windows theme, or get rid of themes altogether. there are a few more, but i am sick (strep-throat) as hell today and can't think.

    all in all, i just meant if you are dead set on XP, you don't need to sweat, it will work. yes 98se would run pretty quick. i just don't like it anymore, i'm spoiled by the fact that XP just doesn't crash as much. also 2000 would prolly be the best compromise between speed and stability.
    Last edited by purewire; 06-20-2004 at 06:33 PM.

    Thing One: Core2Duo E7200 @ 3.6GHz//2x2GB OCZ DDR2 800//Asus P5Q Pro//ATi HD 4850 PCI-E//ATI TV-Wonder HD650//500GB SATA Caviar Black HDD//12x LiteOn DVD-RW//22" Acer LCD Widescreen


    Thing Two: 1.6GHz Atom//1024MB SODIMM//160GB HDD//intel Graphics//8.9" LCD Screen
    ____________________
    Heatware Evals 19-0-0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •