Mobility x1400 HyperMemory vs Geforce 7300 Go TurboCache

Sharky Forums


Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mobility x1400 HyperMemory vs Geforce 7300 Go TurboCache

  1. 08-15-2006, 10:34 AM #1
    Wankey
    Wankey is offline
    Catfish Wankey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    120

    Mobility x1400 HyperMemory vs Geforce 7300 Go TurboCache

    The 7300 Go is $50 more expensive than the x1400 Mobility. A lot of people I know have said that the x1400 is even faster than the 7300 Go at some things, so I'm wondering if i should spend the extra $50 to get that 7300 Go on my laptop.

    Most of the games I'll be playing will probably be quite graphics intensive like HL2 + CSS etc, CnC 3, Supreme Commander etc.

    Anyone can recommend me what to do?
    Last edited by Wankey; 08-15-2006 at 11:29 AM.
    WorldWynd Designs
    Need a fast, sleek, professional business website? Click.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-15-2006, 11:10 AM #2
    soupnazi
    soupnazi is offline
    Zoom-Zoom! soupnazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    15,097
    Perhaps this will help. It looks like X1400 > 7300GO & 7400GO.
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/show...ht=video+cards
    Last edited by soupnazi; 08-15-2006 at 12:00 PM.
    Spoiler
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-16-2006, 12:55 AM #3
    kpxgq
    kpxgq is offline
    nuclear launch detected kpxgq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    16,612
    the x1400 is significantly better than the 7300...i take it you are looking at a dell e1505/1705?
    bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 08-16-2006, 01:47 AM #4
    Boneycat
    Boneycat is offline
    Mako Shark Boneycat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    4,815
    I was pleasantly surprised about how well the x1400 performed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 08-16-2006, 01:52 AM #5
    kpxgq
    kpxgq is offline
    nuclear launch detected kpxgq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    16,612
    i have a dell e1505 laptop with these specs:
    - 1.86ghz Core 2 Duo - Yonah
    - 1gb DDR2
    - 256mb Radeon X1400

    i get a steady 30-60fps in all Source based games (HL2, CS:S) with Medium-High settings and 1280x800 resolution... Quake 4 is good at medium while Oblivion and FEAR are pretty much unplayable unless you can stand 640x480
    bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 08-16-2006, 01:54 AM #6
    Boneycat
    Boneycat is offline
    Mako Shark Boneycat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    4,815
    I thought you could get 30fps in fear...as long as you stand in the corner facing the wall and not move that is.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 08-16-2006, 03:59 PM #7
    Mach5Motorsport
    Mach5Motorsport is offline
    Catfish Mach5Motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    1hr from Silicon Valley, CA 15 min from Laguna Seca, CA
    Posts
    193
    For any serious gamming of modern titles, go for a laptop with 1 Gig RAM and the Go7600 or mobile x1600 with 256 MB dedicated RAM. There are companies selling laptops with these features for under $1500. ex. HP dv8000t with a Core Duo T2250.
    Mach5Motorsport "Dieter"

    AMD 64 3000+ Socket 754/AGP (With Pride!)
    6800GS
    &
    HP Pavillion dv8000t (Duo Core T2250 with Nvidia Go7600)
    Speech Instructor
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules