|
-
«:::Cynical Shark:::»
Entertainment Weekly: PS3 v.s Wii v.s 360
While keeping an eye on reports of diehard gamers (and more than a few eBay entreprenuers) braving long lines and cold nights — and even facing down guns — to purchase their Sony PS3s and Nintendo Wiis, we spent the last weekend putting these new consoles, as well as the year-old Xbox 360, through their paces. You might be surprised (or outraged) by our grades. So please keep in mind that these reviews reflect our immediate post-launch impressions — we promise to re-review them within the next year.
read it
interesting on the PS3 -
The first batch of games is a letdown: Most of them look no better than what you can see on the Xbox 360 — and none offer any revolutionary step up in gameplay.
were they supposed to? guess they forgot this console was supposed to be released when the 360 was and was supposed to compete directly with it and is therefore just as old as the 360....they make it sound like the PS3 was just thought up and released....
 Originally Posted by ua549
In Canada you'd probably have to wait at least 30 days to get a broken arm fixed.
Biostar TZ77B
[email protected]
Hyper 212+
16GB Samsung DDR3
Dual 19" Syncmaster 953bw
Samsung DVD-RW
480GB PNY SSD
1.5 TB WD Green SATA
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB Seagate
3.0 TB Seagate External
4.0 TB Seagate External
-
nuclear launch detected
bitfenix prodigy, i5 4670k, asrock z87e-itx, zotac gtx 970, crucial m500 msata, seasonic x650, dell st2220t
-
«:::Cynical Shark:::»
 Originally Posted by kpxgq
ummm does anyone care?
probably the fanboys who get more and more depressed with every anti-PS3 article published.... I can tell.
 Originally Posted by ua549
In Canada you'd probably have to wait at least 30 days to get a broken arm fixed.
Biostar TZ77B
[email protected]
Hyper 212+
16GB Samsung DDR3
Dual 19" Syncmaster 953bw
Samsung DVD-RW
480GB PNY SSD
1.5 TB WD Green SATA
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB Seagate
3.0 TB Seagate External
4.0 TB Seagate External
-
What you gonna do?!?
-
Hammerhead Shark
I still find it kind of annoying that every review has a line that reads something like this...."Even though the PS3 is massively more powerful than the 360....." Ok, nothing about the games bear that out, and most tech heads agree that it doesn't appear so either(most agree the 360 has a better GPU). It is that they truly don't understand the tech stuff and just regurgitate what sony told them? Believe your eyes and your ears...the PS3 is roughly equal in power to the 360.
2004-----------------------------------------------1986
Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker
-
I don't roll on Shabbos!
I've been reading some articles about the Cell vs 360's triple core. They did an indepth analysis and found out that 360's cpu does more gigaflops than the Cell. I wish I could find it. I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.
PC: Corsair 550D
4280k | Asus Rampage Gene | Mushkin 4x4GB | EVGA 780
Intel 120GB SSD + 2TB Seagate | Seasonic 660 Plat
2x Alphacool XT45 | Laing DDC | Bitspower
Currently playing: Civ 5
Last Game Beaten: Walking Dead
-
[Insert witty title here]
 Originally Posted by Timman_24
I've been reading some articles about the Cell vs 360's triple core. They did an indepth analysis and found out that 360's cpu does more gigaflops than the Cell. I wish I could find it. I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.
In many ways, it was even worse with the PS2.
I think it's irresponsible, but most of these media outlets would simply say something like "Well, we're only reporting on the perceived impact it's having and the way the public is seeing it".
Either way, there's no doubt everytime the story hits the mainstream media, it helps Sony. People see huge lines for the system, and news reporters in electronics stores reporting on the "overwhelming popularity of Sony's newest video game console!", and it's infinetly better advertising than anything Sony could come up with themselves.
Current System
| Intel Core i7 950 | Gigabyte X58A-UD3R | OCZ 6Gb DDR3 1600 | PNY GeForce GTX 570 | WD Caviar Black 1TB | Windows 7 Pro x64
Currently Playing: The Old Republic, Fallout New Vegas, Xenoblade Chronicles
Last Completed:Super Mario Land 3D..... 8.5/10
-
Great White Shark
 Originally Posted by Timman_24
I've been reading some articles about the Cell vs 360's triple core. They did an indepth analysis and found out that 360's cpu does more gigaflops than the Cell. I wish I could find it. I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.
I don't completely know about the specs of the multi-core processors in the 360 and PS3 but Sony marketed the Cell as twice as powerful compared to the 360. Developers such as EA and others stated in EGM that it would take beyond the life cycle of the console to truly tap the power of the Cell. On that note, I haven't seen anything on the PS3 that can't be done on the 360.
Last edited by hongsc; 11-22-2006 at 03:49 AM.
Macbook Pro: Dual Boot: OSX Leopard/Vista Home Premium|2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo|4GB RAM|128MB 8600GT|120GB HDD|Double-layer SuperDrive|1TB Seagate|Logitech VX Nano|Apple Al BT keyboard|ATH-A500|8GB iPhone|
-
«:::Cynical Shark:::»
 Originally Posted by hongsc
On that note, I haven't seen anything on the PS3 that can't be done on the 360.
and you won't.
sony also knows nintendo's inner workings, they know exactly what games the wii will support and how backward compatible it is - before it was released... sony is so full of **** it's stupid.
 Originally Posted by ua549
In Canada you'd probably have to wait at least 30 days to get a broken arm fixed.
Biostar TZ77B
[email protected]
Hyper 212+
16GB Samsung DDR3
Dual 19" Syncmaster 953bw
Samsung DVD-RW
480GB PNY SSD
1.5 TB WD Green SATA
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB Seagate
3.0 TB Seagate External
4.0 TB Seagate External
-
Has got that jut
 Originally Posted by vairox
guess they forgot this console was supposed to be released when the 360 was and was supposed to compete directly with it and is therefore just as old as the 360....they make it sound like the PS3 was just thought up and released....
With technology, it is expected that if you come out a full year after the competition, you should be technologically more advanced. Doesn't matter when it was "supposed to" come out, what matters is when it DOES come out. When Duke Nukem Forever comes out, are we going to judge it based on Half Life which came out the same year that DNF was supposed to?
Couldn't resist the cheap shot at DNF.
 Originally Posted by Timman_24
I do hate how the media has bought into Sony's hype about the Cell be all powerful.
I haven't really seen anything except for ads where the media has bought into the hype. Most stuff I see talks about how the games really aren't any better than the 360's.
Last edited by monroeski; 11-22-2006 at 03:47 PM.
Comp - i7 950, Radeon HD 5870, 6gb DDR3 1600
Currently Playing - Gravity Rush 2, DOOM (2017), Nex Machina
Currently Reading - Dracula by Bram Stoker
-
Master of the obvious
I never understood why people would wait in line and fight over a console that only has mediocre games at the moment.
Why bother?
-
«:::Cynical Shark:::»
 Originally Posted by monroeski
With technology, it is expected that if you come out a full year after the competition, you should be technologically more advanced. Doesn't matter when it was "supposed to" come out, what matters is when it DOES come out. When Duke Nukem Forever comes out, are we going to judge it based on Half Life which came out the same year that DNF was supposed to? 
thats the issue.... sony is not more advanced, they are way late to the game and they have to say that in the articles... and they are not, they just keep saying how much more powerful it is and how much more technically advanced it is... it's an 04 beemer that was just released, call it what it is.
 Originally Posted by ua549
In Canada you'd probably have to wait at least 30 days to get a broken arm fixed.
Biostar TZ77B
[email protected]
Hyper 212+
16GB Samsung DDR3
Dual 19" Syncmaster 953bw
Samsung DVD-RW
480GB PNY SSD
1.5 TB WD Green SATA
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB Seagate
3.0 TB Seagate External
4.0 TB Seagate External
-
Mako Shark
I read a tech report that said the 360 was technically superior to the PS3, and another that said it was going to take a while for the programmers figure out how to best code for the PS3, and when they did, it would out step the 360. I'm sure games for both systems will improve, but I doubt the PS3 will be superior to the 360.
-
«:::Cynical Shark:::»
by the time they figure out how to program for it or whatever else and the games start looking superior, M$ will already have it's next console out.
 Originally Posted by ua549
In Canada you'd probably have to wait at least 30 days to get a broken arm fixed.
Biostar TZ77B
[email protected]
Hyper 212+
16GB Samsung DDR3
Dual 19" Syncmaster 953bw
Samsung DVD-RW
480GB PNY SSD
1.5 TB WD Green SATA
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB WD Red
3.0 TB Seagate
3.0 TB Seagate External
4.0 TB Seagate External
-
[Insert witty title here]
 Originally Posted by Adisharr
I never understood why people would wait in line and fight over a console that only has mediocre games at the moment.
Why bother?
You and your "logic".
pfft!
Current System
| Intel Core i7 950 | Gigabyte X58A-UD3R | OCZ 6Gb DDR3 1600 | PNY GeForce GTX 570 | WD Caviar Black 1TB | Windows 7 Pro x64
Currently Playing: The Old Republic, Fallout New Vegas, Xenoblade Chronicles
Last Completed:Super Mario Land 3D..... 8.5/10
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|