Review of the X2900XT by VR-ZONE.com...

[Julia Ivvv]

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4946&s=12

In the review they were comparing a X2900XT to stock 8800GTX, slightly overclocked 8800GTS 640MB and superclocked 8800GTS 320MB

8800GTX was performing better that X2900XT in all benchmarks

Even 8800GTS was performing better than X2900XT in many cases

[capt.sekaran]

go f--- yourself


ppl tis spammer veron...

[2630Goon]

...

[7192004]

k...............I'll move along........

[mikeysg]

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4946&s=12

In the review they were comparing a X2900XT to stock 8800GTX, slightly overclocked 8800GTS 640MB and superclocked 8800GTS 320MB

8800GTX was performing better that X2900XT in all benchmarks

Even 8800GTS was performing better than X2900XT in many cases

I dunno what the point of this thread is, but I'll indulge you. Firstly, the HD 2800XT isn't meant to compete against the 8800GTX, look at its price point, it's more to match the 8800GTS. Also consider this, the G80 has been out for months now, and nV has gotten an earful from disgruntled G80 buyers due to initial driver releases. The situation has improved greatly over the past few months and nV seems to be releasing better and better drivers. I'd expect ATi drivers would have to go thru a few revisions before they get on the right track........this is simply reality.