|
-
Tiger Shark
Using more than 2 GB RAM
What lines do you add to the Boot.ini fire in XP so that the system will use more than 2 GB of RAM. Will this actually work? Will I benefit from 3 Gb instead of only 2?
Update: How high can I set the switch? The example I saw was: /NoExecute=AlwaysOff /3g
Last edited by NC; 03-10-2009 at 08:51 PM.
Dell 8300, XP Home, GeForce FX5200, HR MicroDAC audio and Swans M200 MKII
IBM T60 Thinkpad
-
Administrator
32 bit Operating Systems will use anywhere from 3 to 3.5 gigs of ram without doing anything..(provided the mobo is designed to use it)
"Vegetarians live up to nine years longer than the rest of us...Nine horrible, worthless, baconless years."
-
You are thinking of the switch that causes a program's 4GB virtual address space to be divided into blocks of 3GB for the code and 1GB for the OS instead of the default 2/2. Only programs that are coded to take advantage of the 3GB address space can use it. The most common program I can think of that uses the 3GB block is SQL Server.
That switch is of no practical use for a desktop machine.
-
Mako Shark
^^
What ua said.
 Originally Posted by Steve R Jones
32 bit Operating Systems will use anywhere from 3 to 3.5 gigs of ram without doing anything..(provided the mobo is designed to use it)
Yes. To the OP, xp and vista 32bit are limited to 4GB memory, not 2GB.
However this 4GB includes video card memory. So if you have a graphics card with 512MB inbuilt memory, then windows can address 3.5GB of RAM. If you have a 128MB card, then windows can address 3.75GB RAM. (etc, etc, etc)
Last edited by wh666-666; 03-11-2009 at 02:38 PM.
Compaq A910em: T2330 dual core 1.6Ghz, X3100 384MB GPU, 160GB sata HDD, 2GB RAM
Gaming rig: Asus Striker II, Coolermaster GX 750w, E4600 @ 2.4Ghz, 2.5GB RAM, Zerotherm FZ 120, 9500GT 1GB
Server: Mac mini running W23k Server - 1.8Ghz dual-core, 1GB RAM, 1x80GB, 2x500GB externals + LTO1 tape backup
An important petition, regarding your human rights:
https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitio...r-both-genders
-
Nerdy.......AND sexy
I upgraded my rig from 2 to 4 gigs...Vista 32-bit ( windows 7 ). I didnt see any diff in boot up time, programs ran the same , games do load up a big faster, but not alot.
Not really worth it.
i5 2500K
Gigabyte H67A-UD3H-B3
8 GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3
Evga GTX470
Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000 aluminum case
Silverstone Zeus 750W
X-fi Gamer
Altec Lansing MX 5021s
-
Administrator
 Originally Posted by dimmy32
I upgraded my rig from 2 to 4 gigs...Vista 32-bit ( windows 7 ). I didnt see any diff in boot up time, programs ran the same , games do load up a big faster, but not alot.
Not really worth it.
It depends on the apps and how many of em you have open at one time
"Vegetarians live up to nine years longer than the rest of us...Nine horrible, worthless, baconless years."
-
My Windows 7 test system uses about 10GB out of 16GB. Stats
With only half the memory, I imagine it would run at paging file disk speed.
With 4GB of memory, it wouldn't run.
-
Raaawwwrrrrr
 Originally Posted by Steve R Jones
It depends on the apps and how many of em you have open at one time 
agreed. even just running a dual monitor makes the extra 2 gigs worth it and even more so when games are running.
Steam- DerSchniffles
Gigabyte z77-UD3H
Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.5
8 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR 3 1600
Sony AVR with 5.1/Asus Xonar DG
EVGA GTX760 @ 1241/7000
60 gig OS and 240 gig Game SSD's
55" Vizio Tv/32" Vizio
Logitech G700s Mouse and K520 Keyboard
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|