How high are the P4's ? - Page 2

Sharky Forums


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: How high are the P4's ?

  1. #16
    Sleeps with the Fishes Newbie-Overclocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver BC Canada
    Posts
    2,672

    Post

    Originally posted by FaTs:
    It's better than that one

    Thats what you think



    ------------------
    2*P3 1.1ghz 100mhz FSB
    1024megs Pc133 SD-ram Cas2
    Abit Vp6
    2* Atlas 10K SCSI RAID
    YAMAHA 16* CD-RW
    ATI R8500 275/300
    Sound Blaster Audigy
    Sony 21" Trinitron
    23" Tower w/450watt PSU
    2 X Alpha pal HSF
    Sony Headphones
    Dual boot
    WindowsXP PRO/corp w/WindowsXP plus
    Windows2K PRO service pak2
    OfficeXP Final

    My Mind is already made up don't confuse me with facts.

  2. #17
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    252

    Post

    ....
    Last edited by The Evil Tin Tin; 05-22-2009 at 01:44 PM.

  3. #18
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    510

    Post

    Originally posted by The Evil Tin Tin:
    The P4 will reach 10 ghz, but in like 3 years apparently, but wait about 5 years and Intel are hoping to hit about 20 Ghz! Should perform well with the Geforce 13 1024 Mb! Lol

    They're a LOT closer than you'd think.

    Fred


  4. #19
    Sleeps with the Fishes talldude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    The North
    Posts
    9,440

    Post

    watch the time fly by...i'd say less than 100 years and we will have computers that are so powerful, you never need another upgrade again (except for bragging rights). Terahertz processors etc...it'll be interesting for sure.

    ------------------
    squire of an OC Crusader
    Abit SH6 (finally working )
    p3 slot1 700@860mhz (cooled by alpha p3125)
    Max OC to boot in windows 896 mhz
    creative geforce 256 120@150 core 166@200 memory
    soundblaster live platinum
    2x 128 mb pc-100 ram cas2 (awesome stuff)
    28.5GB barracuda ATA
    creative CDRW 4x4x32
    buffalo 11mbs wireless lan
    SE Overclockers SETI@Home Team

  5. #20
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    252

    Post

    ...
    Last edited by The Evil Tin Tin; 05-22-2009 at 01:44 PM.

  6. #21
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    860

    Post

    Originally posted by The Evil Tin Tin

    Yeah I have read somewere that at the moment they are not to far off being able to produce processcors which can do the same amount of calculations as the human brain, somthing like 20 years away from that, at the moment we are round about the same amount of operations as a mouse, which is still very impressive when you think about it. Who nows maybe within a hundred years we can have these Terahertz processcors implanted in our brains and attempt the ultimate overclocking project!
    lol
    But the difference between a mouse's brain and a computer is that a mouse is intelligent (to some degree)! A mouse can make decisions, its living! Such a thing is mathematically impossible! Decision-making is random or impredictable, nothing in mathematics is!

  7. #22
    5 Loaves and Two Fish KJY9's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Temporarily assigned to earth!
    Posts
    8,252

    Post

    Originally posted by The Evil Tin Tin:
    The P4 will reach 10 ghz, but in like 3 years apparently, but wait about 5 years and Intel are hoping to hit about 20 Ghz! Should perform well with the Geforce 13 1024 Mb! Lol

    Uh huh and AMD will have a 7Ghz that will outperform Intel's 10 Ghz....some things never change


    ------------------
    KJY9's Rigs
    Whoever said "ignorance is bliss"??

  8. #23
    Great White Shark AMD Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,716

    Post

    Originally posted by hu flung dung:
    But the difference between a mouse's brain and a computer is that a mouse is intelligent (to some degree)! A mouse can make decisions, its living! Such a thing is mathematically impossible! Decision-making is random or impredictable, nothing in mathematics is!

    I've heard there is software out there that learns by itself. Also there are robots that can "think" for themselves already. I'm actually afraid of this technology.


    ------------------
    *the Masta Overclocker*
    Games and Stuff
    My Specs
    *****AMD Soldier*****

  9. #24
    Goldfish
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    62

    Post

    I've heard rumors that the P4 users will be able to buy the processor up until a good 3.5 ghz before they may possibly hit a dead-end.

    This is good news, because I am about to buy a P4 chipset, and the last thing I want Intel to do is change their damn architecture again so that it will be rendered incompatible with existing P4 supporting motherboards.

    I'm very used to having chipsets that last as long as the 440BX, and I expect Intel to devlope one that lasts just as long.

    ------------------
    1.00 GHZ Pentium III
    Hercules 3d Prophet III
    360mb PC100 SDRAM
    Pioneer CD/DVD-ROM 40x, 16x
    4.0 gig HD
    Crappy Yamaha Speakers
    Crappy Yamaha Soundcard

    You lucky berks. I wish I could sit here and listen to me all day.
    1.00 GHZ Pentium III
    Hercules 3d Prophet III
    360mb PC100 SDRAM
    Pioneer CD/DVD-ROM 40x, 16x
    40 gig HDD 7200 rpm
    Crappy Yamaha Speakers
    Crappy Yamaha Soundcard

    You lucky berks. I wish I could sit here and listen to me all day.

  10. #25
    Reef Shark
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    252

    Post

    ...
    Last edited by The Evil Tin Tin; 05-22-2009 at 01:38 PM.

  11. #26
    Tiger Shark
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    860

    Post

    Originally posted by AMD Soldier

    I've heard there is software out there that learns by itself.
    Learning isn't a sign of intelligence! It is nothing more than keeping a record of your experiences for future use!

    For example: if a robot was programmed to walk through a maze, it would keep a record of the location of every dead-end it runs into, so it wouldn't go there again! After going through the entire maze once, it would have 'learned', or kept a record of the correct path to take if it had to go through the maze a second time!

    Also there are robots that can "think" for themselves already. I'm actually afraid of this technology.
    By 'thinking', what do you actually mean? Could you be more specific on how this robot was thinking, or what this robot was thinking about?

    A robot (or computer program) can do any task that has a pattern to it! I have made a program that can solve logic puzzles. Humans have to think when doing these puzzles, but my program just applies trial-and-error to a series of pre-programmed rules to derive the solution for the logic puzzle.

  12. #27
    Great White Shark AMD Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,716

    Post

    Originally posted by hu flung dung:
    Learning isn't a sign of intelligence! It is nothing more than keeping a record of your experiences for future use!

    For example: if a robot was programmed to walk through a maze, it would keep a record of the location of every dead-end it runs into, so it wouldn't go there again! After going through the entire maze once, it would have 'learned', or kept a record of the correct path to take if it had to go through the maze a second time!
    Yes I know it does not show intelligence, all I was saying is that this is the begining. And if there is enough horse power behind it I do believe that the "thing" whatever if maybe will some day think for it self.


    By 'thinking', what do you actually mean? Could you be more specific on how this robot was thinking, or what this robot was thinking about?
    A little while ago I was watching this program on TV that showed scientists talking about this very same subject. Well they showed a rebot that could "think" on it's own. Of course this "thinking" it was doing was at the level of a mouse, it's still incredible what we can do these days. The rebot was reacting with the humans, they have taught it how to greet people, and some interaction with them, like count, etc. But anyways I think you get my point. They have a long ways to go of course, but I'm just saying that it has already began and at the rate there going they will have machines that will compute information as fast as our brains do in 20-40 years.



    ------------------
    *the Masta Overclocker*
    Games and Stuff
    My Specs
    *****AMD Soldier*****

  13. #28
    Expensive Sushi
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33

    Post

    Statistical calculations based on averages does not equal logical reasoning, no common sense factor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •