Rambus - Page 2

Sharky Forums


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Rambus

  1. #16
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, WA, USA
    Posts
    0
    Originally posted by cocacola155


    Huh? Blows?

    RDRAm is the performance leader for the P4
    Read my reply alittle more closely and slowly there turbo .

  2. #17
    Goldfish
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    76
    I really wish people would know what they are talking about when they post so they do not spread FUD around.

    Go price some RDRAM and some quality DDR. You will find the RDRAM cheaper or the same price.

    STOP SAYING DDR IS CHEAPER THAN RDRAM.

    Times change, try to stay current.

  3. #18
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, WA, USA
    Posts
    0
    Originally posted by Nova101
    I really wish people would know what they are talking about when they post so they do not spread FUD around.

    Go price some RDRAM and some quality DDR. You will find the RDRAM cheaper or the same price.

    STOP SAYING DDR IS CHEAPER THAN RDRAM.

    Times change, try to stay current.
    Word. I know some dude who still thinks RDRAM is $800 and that DDR r0x0rz j0r b0x0rz. I am like "dude have you checked prices in the last 5 months" and guess what his answer was. Well he made a fool out of himself for 30 minutes until he verified it himself. It pisses me off that people argue about things that are so easy to check out and make sure you know what your talking about.

  4. #19
    RIP SiS :( CrawlingEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Easton, Pa, USA
    Posts
    7,441
    Snoop, you're forgetting about the latency issues with RDRAM that DDR doesn't have.
    -mark

    OC Crusader
    Sigma Dir CrawlingEye of the Cooler's Guild
    SharkyExtreme.com 3D Mark Team


    Samsung SM348
    Asus P4S533
    Pentium 4 2.26b
    Samsung pc2700 512MB
    Seagate Barracuda IV 40gig 7200RPM
    ATi Radeon 9700 Pro
    Audigy 2
    Leadtek WinFast TV 2000 XP
    Antec pp412x
    Cambridge Megaworks THX 550
    Sennheiser HD212 Pro
    Sennheiser mx300
    Ultrasone HFI 650 Trackmaster
    Rio Karma


    3D Mark 2001SE Compare: 14707
    3D Mark 2003 Compare: 4550

  5. #20
    Sleeps with the Fishes
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, WA, USA
    Posts
    0
    No I remember about the latency issues with RDRAM I just didn't tell him about that LOL . Dont worry I believe Rambus is working on fixing that sometime this year with a new chips based off a better design then the old ones.

  6. #21
    Hammerhead Shark steppy76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    2,702
    RDRAM's latency decreases as its speed increases. It's been said many times that running it at pc1066 its latency is actually less than ddr. RDRAM hasn't even hit its stride yet, and ddr is nearing the end of its life cycle. A quad channel RDRAM chipset offers tons more bandwidth than ddr and can be implemented with fewer pins than a dual channel ddr chipset(ie much easier to make).
    2004-----------------------------------------------1986
    Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
    Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
    512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
    Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
    150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
    48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
    Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker

  7. #22
    RIP SiS :( CrawlingEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Easton, Pa, USA
    Posts
    7,441
    That only proves that RDRAM and DDR are different, and at this point there is no definite winner. Either way you go though, DDR333 or PC800 RDRAM, you're getting performance.

    I wouldn't call either of the systems "slow."
    With the new DDR that'll be coming out, I think DDR's still in the game.
    -mark

    OC Crusader
    Sigma Dir CrawlingEye of the Cooler's Guild
    SharkyExtreme.com 3D Mark Team


    Samsung SM348
    Asus P4S533
    Pentium 4 2.26b
    Samsung pc2700 512MB
    Seagate Barracuda IV 40gig 7200RPM
    ATi Radeon 9700 Pro
    Audigy 2
    Leadtek WinFast TV 2000 XP
    Antec pp412x
    Cambridge Megaworks THX 550
    Sennheiser HD212 Pro
    Sennheiser mx300
    Ultrasone HFI 650 Trackmaster
    Rio Karma


    3D Mark 2001SE Compare: 14707
    3D Mark 2003 Compare: 4550

  8. #23
    . ksuohio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,721
    With my parents newest system, I went with the cheaper of the 2 types, RDRam Really upsets me that I didn't purchase more DDR for my AXP system when it was 1/3 of the price. Now the thought of filling all four slots is out of the question.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    - Asus M50 Laptop - C2D T9300 - 4 gig RAM - Radeon HD 3650 - Vista x64 Ultimate

    - Intel i7-3770K - Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE - 32gig RAM - Radeon HD7970 Ghz - Plextor M3 256GB/120GB OCZ Vertex3
    - LG BluRay - Razor Blackwidow Ultimate Keyboard - Logitech G9x
    - HP ZR2740w/Asus LCD - W7 Ultimate

    ---------------------------------------------------------------

  9. #24
    Reef Shark chronicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NYC, NY, USA
    Posts
    311
    You should be fine

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •