|
-
Reef Shark
Windows XP and Clear Type fonts?
Who uses Clear Type fonts w/Windows XP? I just set it and am trying to get used to it. I'm used to the normal smooth fonts, but everyone keeps saying Clear Type fonts are MUCH better.
Just curious!
-
Reef Shark
I installed it once and then formatted cause I hated it so bad...it actually hurt my eyes to look at my screen...I formatted cause I tried to uninstall it but the font never changed and was still hurting my eyes....
Intel Celeron 850 @850
AOpen AX3SP Pro Mobo
256 MB PC133 RAM
Fujitsu 30 Gig HD
Samsung 80 Gig HD
Tornado Geforce2 MX 400 64MB Vid
Soundblaster Live X-Gamer 5.1
RetailPlus+ 52x cd drive
RetailPlus+ 8x4x32 cdrw
KTX 15" color monitor
Windows XP Pro with SP1
-
Ancient Member
Yep my eyes hurt with clear type fonts so I have them set to standard. They shouldn't hurt because my comp is on a 100hz refresh rate but they do which is pretty strange.
-
Tiger Shark
Cleartype fonts are meant to be used on LCD monitors to make the text easier to read. On a regular analog monitor they make my eyes hurt too because that's not what they're meant to be used on. They eat extra resources too anyway so shut them off.
-
Hammerhead Shark
I can't stand not using them now...while they originally were intended for LCD's, give them a few days before turning them off...once you get used to them, not using cleartype makes everything look so windows 3.1ish. It's just a different method of AA'ing fonts, so people are nuts if it's causing them headaches...they may prefer them, but IQ IS a matter of personal preference. Try them for yourself.
2004-----------------------------------------------1986
Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker
-
Hammerhead Shark
When I first installed XP, like many people, I enabled cleartype straight away. At first, I thought they looked quite good, but in the end I reverted back cos they made my computers video speed quite a bit slower, and even though standard fonts look blockier, they are actually a lot easier to read IMO.
Regards, Paul
AMD Athlon XP2600+, Thermalright SLK-800, YS-Tech Silent Fans, Lian Li PC60 USB, Corsair XMS2700 1.25 Gb RAM, PNY Geforce 6800 GT, E-MU 0404, NEC ND-3500A DVD Burner, LG 48x CDRW, Western Digital 120Gb HD, Iiyama Vision Master Pro 510, Rotel RA-01 amp, Rega Ela speakers, Beyer DT531 headphones
-
Reef Shark
Thanks for the replies. I didn't know they were intended for LCD monitors! I am kinda getting used to them, but was really curious if everyne bit on them.
If you look at your shortcut lettering on your desktop and switch between the two there is a noticable difference. The ClearType is much better ...
I'll most likely go back to standard, but wanted to give ClearType an honest chance since there was soooo much hype about them.
Thanks again guys/gals!
-
Goldfish
I myself got hooked on them too. It does make it hard for me to read text on any other computer tho. But with Cleartype enabled, my eyes don't start hurting as soon as before. Plus I definitely think it's much clearer than without it enabled. And if it looks better, who cares if it uses up a few more resources .
2 x Tbird 1.33ghz - Tyan Tiger MP - Thermalright SK6 - 512MB ECC Registered Corsair DDR - ATI Radeon 8500 Retail - 60gig IBM 60GXP - 40 gig WD - 16x Toshiba DVD - 8x4x32 Plextor CDRW - Hercules GTXP - 3com nic - Windows XP Pro
-
Tiger Shark
Originally posted by steppy76
but IQ IS a matter of personal preference.
I prefer to have an IQ of 216, but that's just me.
-
Hammerhead Shark
Image Quality is a matter of personal preference...all hail the uber geek remington 
Just a joke about the 216 IQ, no harm meant rem.
Last edited by steppy76; 03-17-2002 at 10:51 PM.
2004-----------------------------------------------1986
Athlon XP 1600------------------------[email protected]
Shuttle AK31 mobo------------------no clue anymore
512MB PC2100 RAM------------------------256K RAM
Powercolor 9700 NP-----------------------4 color CGA
150(120 +30)gig hd--------------------2 x 360k 5.25 floppy
48x cd-rom--------------------------------Yeah Right!
Rhythmic Edge-----------------------------PC Speaker
-
Goldfish
Oh my:rolleyes: .
2 x Tbird 1.33ghz - Tyan Tiger MP - Thermalright SK6 - 512MB ECC Registered Corsair DDR - ATI Radeon 8500 Retail - 60gig IBM 60GXP - 40 gig WD - 16x Toshiba DVD - 8x4x32 Plextor CDRW - Hercules GTXP - 3com nic - Windows XP Pro
-
Tiger Shark
ClearType fonts look oh so much smoother to me... don't notice any extra resources being used though. And even if they did, since these resources are "extra" shouldn't that be more reason to use them? Isn't that why you buy "extra" RAM? :rolleyes:
And why would you have to reformat after enabling them? It's just a checkbox option -- you can't "uninstall" it. Just enable/disable it by checking the box.
-
Reef Shark
Originally posted by aeflux66
ClearType fonts look oh so much smoother to me... don't notice any extra resources being used though. And even if they did, since these resources are "extra" shouldn't that be more reason to use them? Isn't that why you buy "extra" RAM? :rolleyes:
And why would you have to reformat after enabling them? It's just a checkbox option -- you can't "uninstall" it. Just enable/disable it by checking the box.
The one I installed was some download version with no uninstall....plus I was bored and wanted to partition my hd...solved a bunch of problems at once.
Intel Celeron 850 @850
AOpen AX3SP Pro Mobo
256 MB PC133 RAM
Fujitsu 30 Gig HD
Samsung 80 Gig HD
Tornado Geforce2 MX 400 64MB Vid
Soundblaster Live X-Gamer 5.1
RetailPlus+ 52x cd drive
RetailPlus+ 8x4x32 cdrw
KTX 15" color monitor
Windows XP Pro with SP1
-
Tiger Shark
Originally posted by aeflux66
And even if they did, since these resources are "extra" shouldn't that be more reason to use them? Isn't that why you buy "extra" RAM? :rolleyes:
I'd rather not waste ram on something that hurts my eyes. Even if they didn't blind me for life I'd probably leave them off since they use more cpu power than memory.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|