|
-
64mb geforce2 MX400 pci Or Radeon 7000 32mb PCI
I am adding a second video card and iam not able to spend more that 60 dollars ......So let me know which is a better choice.........
-
Hammerhead Shark
That Radeon should wallop that geforce without too much trouble. That would be my pick.
Phenom II 550BE . Biostar TA-785G3. 512MB HD4850 . 2 GB DDR3 . WD 250 GB Sata . Razer AC1 . 500W psu. Win 7 Home
-
no doubt
go for radeon way better stability and drivers.
-
Mako Shark
what kind of vid card do you have now. if you have an nvidia card then get the mx, but if you have an ati card get the 7000. it reduces potential problems with driver conflicts
Samsung 204T
Athlon64X2 4400+
2gb corsair xms
dfi lanparty (1.375v fixed ram issues)
bfgtech 7800gt
74gb raptor
160gb wd
lianli case
.....im sold on the whole dual core thing
DETROIT BASKETBALL!!!!!
Boilermaker class of 2008
-
Hammerhead Shark
Re: no doubt
Originally posted by bigpig1969
go for radeon way better stability and drivers.
LOL I'd say they have good stability and great drivers (now anyway), but way better than nvidia's?? Yeah right :rolleyes: iirc the radeon 7000 does not have harware t&l so the performance between the two should be close.
-
Man, ive been gone 1 day any everyone's lost the plot. LOL
7000 better than a MX400? you gotta be kidding. Even in PCI flavour the 7000 isnt better than a MX200.
ATI drivers are better? Since when?
Better stability? another joke?
Did Nvidia just piss everyone off and i missed it? whats with all the sudden misslead ATI bias?
The 7000 really sucks compared to a MX400.And thats no joke.
Q6600 (GO), Zalman CNPS 9700, Gigabyte P35-DS3P, 4G Kingston 6400 C5, Leadtek PX 8800 GT ZL (650/1800)
2x WD 500GB SATA, ASUS + Pioneer DVRW, Antec Sonata lll case, Samsung 226BW 22"LCD, Logitech X540 7.1 speakers, Logitech G5 mouse
3GHz(9x333), stock Vcore, stock cooler
3.2GHz(8x400), +0.050vcore (gaming, 24/7)
3.6GHz(9x400), +0.150vcore (3DMark01 60769)
3.8GHz(9x422), 1.5v min(set) (3d01 62926, 3d03 42285, Crysis High 1680x1050 34fps) Ouch! She’s hot!
-
Man With Nothing To Lose
If it were a 7000 vs a MX200 then I'd say the 7000 would be faster. It doesn't have a T&L unit so the performance wouldn't be bottlnecked as much as the T&L equipped MX200 would be.
Anyway, the MX400 is probably faster.
Last edited by jagojago12; 08-24-2002 at 07:03 AM.
"If everything you try works, then you are not trying hard enough." - Gordon E. Moore
Desktop:
AMD Athlon XP [email protected] (11.0x210) | EPoX EP-8RDA+ | 512MB Crucial PC3200 | VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 | nVidia SoundStorm 5.1 | 160GB 7200RPM Western Digital | 48x/12x/48x Lite-On CD-RW | Lite-On 16x DVD-RW | 19" NEC AccuSync 90
Laptop:
Intel Pentium-M 1.4GHz ULV | 512MB Nanya PC2700 | ATi Mobility Radeon 9200 | 60GB 4200RPM Toshiba | 8x/16x/10x/24x Matshita DVD/CDRW | 12.1" Sony XGA TFT
SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team
-
I am currently running a voodoo 5 5500 agp
i want a second monitor for web developement , or gaming on the side
-
Catfish
I just bought the GF2MX400 for a friend. Its a great card for the buck. I don't think you can go wrong with it.
-
Hammerhead Shark
just go with the gf2mx400
when i had a tnt2m64(agp) i added my old banshee (pci) for dual display(3dfx-nvidia)
so nvidia-ati isn't a problem
-
Mr Zurkon is here to kill
get the mx400...it has t&l unlike the radeon 7000...the radeon 7000 doesn't even have hyper z enabled on it which automatically looses like 10%-20% in performance...
Lian Li PC-K7B | Intel i5 750 | 4GB A-Data 1600 | Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3R | XFX Radeon 5850 | 2-640GB WD Caviar Blue | X-fi Xtrememusic | Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultra | Dell U2311H | Antec Basiq Plus 550W | NEC 3550A | Win7 Ultimate x64
and a whole lot of lovin..
-
Man With Nothing To Lose
http://mirror.ati.com/products/pc/radeon7000/index.html
Powered by the RADEON™ 7000 (a.k.a RADEON VE) graphics processor
ATI HYPER Z™ technology reduces memory bandwidth consumption resulting in improved 3D performance
A Radeon 7000 has HyperZ but the lack of a T&L unit really kills it. Still a Mobility Radeon 7000 at 166/166 is about the same performance as a Voodoo3 (Faster in Direct3D, slower in OpenGL).
I believe desktop 7000's are at 183/183 so they will probably be overall faster than Voodoo3/TNT2 calibur graphics cards.
"If everything you try works, then you are not trying hard enough." - Gordon E. Moore
Desktop:
AMD Athlon XP [email protected] (11.0x210) | EPoX EP-8RDA+ | 512MB Crucial PC3200 | VisionTek GeForce4 Ti4600 | nVidia SoundStorm 5.1 | 160GB 7200RPM Western Digital | 48x/12x/48x Lite-On CD-RW | Lite-On 16x DVD-RW | 19" NEC AccuSync 90
Laptop:
Intel Pentium-M 1.4GHz ULV | 512MB Nanya PC2700 | ATi Mobility Radeon 9200 | 60GB 4200RPM Toshiba | 8x/16x/10x/24x Matshita DVD/CDRW | 12.1" Sony XGA TFT
SharkyExtreme 3DMark Team
-
Tiger Shark
Try to find Voodoo5 5500 PCI, it's still the fastest pci-card available.
...Chaos within...
Long live the 3dfx communities
[P4 NW 2.4B @ ~2.8GHz C1]
[ASUS P4PE]
[512MB 333MHz DDR-SDRAM]
[Hercules R8500LE 64MB]
[WindowsXP Professional SP1]
---------------------------------------------
...Järven jäällä kirves soi teräs lauloi ja verta joi...
...GeForce-huora ja nVidiootti lammaslauma hurraten mestataan ja Suomi takaisin lunastetaan...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|